Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33593933›Full record

ArticleRMD open2021

Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in 608 patients with psoriatic arthritis in real life: a 24-month prospective, multicentre study.

Roberta Ramonda, Mariagrazia Lorenzin, Antonio Carriero, Maria Sole Chimenti, Raffaele Scarpa, Antonio Marchesoni, Ennio Lubrano di Scorpaniello, Carlo Salvarani, Alberto Cauli, Angelo Semeraro and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Roberta Ramonda *Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy roberta.ramonda@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9683-8873
Mariagrazia Lorenzin *Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy.
Antonio CarrieroRheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL), Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza Local Health System, Potenza, Basilicata, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3112-6488
Maria Sole ChimentiDepartment of "Medicina dei Sistemi", University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Lazio, Italy.
Raffaele ScarpaRheumatology Research Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5808-6607
Antonio MarchesoniRheumatology Unit, Department of Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Ennio Lubrano di ScorpanielloAcademic Rheumatology Unit, Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze per la Salute "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Molise, Italy.
Carlo SalvaraniRheumatology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda USL-IRCCS, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Alberto CauliRheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Sardegna, Italy.
Angelo SemeraroRheumatology Unit, Martina Franca-ASL Taranto, Martina Franca Hospital, Martina Franca, Puglia, Italy.
Leonardo SantoRheumatology Service, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Barletta Andria Trani-DSS4 Barletta, Andria, Puglia, Italy.
Augusta OrtolanRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy.
Andrea DoriaRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0548-4983
Elena FracassiRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, AOUI University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.
Giulia VirelliRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, AOUI University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.
Marco MasiaRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, AOUI University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.
Rosalinda FanizziRheumatology Unit, Martina Franca-ASL Taranto, Martina Franca Hospital, Martina Franca, Puglia, Italy.
Elisa VisalliRheumatology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico S. Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Sicilia, Italy.
Giorgio AmatoRheumatology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico S. Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Sicilia, Italy.
Antonio CarlettoRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, AOUI University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.
Rosario FotiRheumatology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico S. Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Sicilia, Italy.
on behalf Spondyloartritis and Psoriatic Arthritis SIR Study Group “Antonio Spadaro”

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate in a multicentric Italian cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on secukinumab followed for 24 months: (1) the long-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, (2) the drug retention rate and minimal disease activity (MDA), (3) differences in the outcomes according to the biological treatment line: biologic-naïve patients (

methodsConsecutive patients with PsA receiving secukinumab were evaluated prospectively. Disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities and follow-up duration were collected. Disease activity/functional/clinimetric scores and biochemical values were recorded at baseline (T0), 6(T6), 12(T12) and 24(T24) months. Effectiveness was evaluated overtime with descriptive statistics; multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of drug-discontinuation and MDA at T6. Infections and adverse events were recorded.

results608 patients (41.28% men; mean (SD) age 52.78 (11.33)) were enrolled; secukinumab was prescribed as first-line biological treatment in 227 (37.34%) patients, as second (or more)-line biological treatment in 381 (62.66%). Effectiveness of secukinumab was shown with an improvement in several outcomes, such as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (T0=3.26 (0.88) vs T24=1.60 (0.69) ;p=0.02) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (T0=25.29 (11.14) vs T24=7.69 (4.51); p<0.01). At T24,

conclusionsIn a real-life clinical setting, secukimumab proved safe and effective in all PsA domains, with notable drug retention rate.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedsecukinumabantirheumatic agentsarthritisbiological therapypsoriatic

Identifiers

PMID33593933
PMCPMC7888309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.