Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33593785›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update.

Perri R Tutelman, Charlotte L Langley, Christine T Chambers, Jennifer A Parker, G Allen Finley, Darlene Chapman, Gareth T Jones, Gary J Macfarlane, Justina Marianayagam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Neurosurgical management for chronic and end-of-life pain in children: A systematic review.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Physical function estimates change in pain following IIPT among children with chronic pain.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Article
  12. Coping in youth living with chronic pain: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Perri R TutelmanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6013-7402
Charlotte L LangleyCentre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0291-8734
Christine T ChambersDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Christine.Chambers@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7138-916X
Jennifer A ParkerCentre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9900-4703
G Allen FinleyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4579-7749
Darlene ChapmanLibrary Services, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Gareth T JonesEpidemiology Group and Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Gary J MacfarlaneEpidemiology Group and Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2322-3314
Justina MarianayagamPatient Partner, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR FRN167902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic pain, defined as persistent or recurring pain or pain lasting longer than 3 months, is a common childhood problem and can profoundly impact children's physical, psychological and social functioning. The last comprehensive systematic review estimating the prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents was published in 2011. Since then, the literature on paediatric chronic pain has grown substantially. This manuscript outlines a protocol for an updated systematic review to provide updated estimates of the prevalence of various forms of chronic pain in children and adolescence. The review will also examine the relationship between sociodemographic and psychosocial factors related to chronic pain prevalence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will search EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO for observational studies published in English between 2009 and 2020 reporting population-based estimates of chronic non-disease-related pain prevalence in children or adolescents (age ≤19 years). Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts retrieved from the search based on predefined eligibility criteria. The full texts of relevant studies will then be assessed by two reviewers. Studies meeting inclusion criteria will be categorised according to the type of pain investigated: headache only, abdominal pain only, back pain only, musculoskeletal pain, combined pain, general pain and other pain. Data will be extracted using customised forms and studies will be assessed for risk of bias using a 10-item tool developed by Hoy ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through publication in an academic journal, presentations at conferences and in various media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020198690.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMusculoskeletal PainAbdominal PainAdolescentAdultChildHeadacheHumansPrevalenceResearch DesignReview Literature as TopicYoung Adultepidemiologypaediatricspain management

Identifiers

PMID33593785
PMCPMC7888311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.