Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33593753›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021

Co-production of knowledge: the future.

S Redman, T Greenhalgh, L Adedokun, S Staniszewska, S Denegri, Co-production of Knowledge Collection Steering Committee

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. How Should We Communicate Information Regarding Birth Choices to Women?: An Online Randomised Survey.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Trial
  3. The Dilemmas and Opportunities of Co-Creating Health Interventions to Fit Local Contexts: An Ethnographic Study on the Adaptation of Clinical Guidelines in Tanzania.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Embedding Multiperspective Reflections in Co-Producing a Training Intervention for Care Home Staff: Understanding Group Members' Journeys and Impacts.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  8. COVID-19 Vaccine Literacy Among Black Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the USA.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S RedmanSax Institute, Sydney, Australia.
T GreenhalghUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
L AdedokunDoris Duke Charitable Foundation, New York, USA.
S StaniszewskaWarwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick UK.
S DenegriAcademy of Medical Sciences, London, UK.
Co-production of Knowledge Collection Steering Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health PolicyIntersectoral CollaborationStakeholder ParticipationCooperative BehaviorHealth Services ResearchHumansKnowledge DiscoveryPower, PsychologicalTrust

Identifiers

PMID33593753
PMCPMC7884902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.