Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33593472›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2022

Body size preferences for women and adolescent girls living in Africa: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Rebecca Pradeilles, Michelle Holdsworth, Oluwabukola Olaitan, Ana Irache, Hibbah A Osei-Kwasi, Christian B Ngandu, Emmanuel Cohen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sex Differences in Obesity and Its Treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Rebecca PradeillesSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences (SSEHS), Loughborough University, LoughboroughLE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0334-3714
Michelle HoldsworthUMR MoISA (Montpellier Interdisciplinary Centre on Sustainable Agri-food Systems), (Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD), Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6028-885X
Oluwabukola OlaitanUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS trust, Leicester, UK.
Ana IracheWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3487-3761
Hibbah A Osei-KwasiDepartment of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5084-6213
Christian B NganduMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9313-606X
Emmanuel CohenMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLoughborough University · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo synthesise evidence on body size preferences for females living in Africa and the factors influencing these.

designMixed-methods systematic review including searches on Medline, CINHAL, ASSIA, Web of Science and PsycINFO (PROSPERO CRD42015020509). A sequential-explanatory approach was used to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings.

settingUrban and rural Africa.

participantsStudies of both sexes providing data on body size preferences for adolescent girls and women aged ≥10 years.

resultsSeventy-three articles from twenty-one countries were included: fifty quantitative, fifteen qualitative and eight mixed methods. Most studies reported a preference for normal or overweight body sizes. Some studies of adolescent girls/young women indicated a preference for underweight. Factors influencing preferences for large(r) body sizes included: socio-demographic (e.g. education, rural residency), health-related (e.g. current BMI, pubertal status), psycho-social (e.g. avoiding HIV stigma) and socio-cultural factors (e.g. spouse's preference, social standing, cultural norms). Factors influencing preferences for slim(mer) body sizes included: socio-demographic (e.g. higher socioeconomic status, urban residency, younger age), health-related (e.g. health knowledge, being nulliparous), psycho-social (e.g. appearance, body size perception as overweight/obese) and socio-cultural factors (e.g. peer pressure, media).

conclusionsPreference for overweight (not obese) body sizes among some African females means that interventions need to account for the array of factors that maintain these preferences. The widespread preference for normal weight is positive in public health terms, but the valorisation of underweight in adolescent girls/young women may lead to an increase in body dissatisfaction. Emphasis needs to be placed on education to prevent all forms of malnutrition.

Indexed as

OverweightThinnessAdolescentAfricaBody Mass IndexBody SizeFemaleHumansMaleObesityAdolescent girlsAfricaBody size preferencesReviewWomen

Identifiers

PMID33593472
PMCPMC9991778
OpenAlexW3132481307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.