Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33593437›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2021

A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions.

Laura van Wijk, Lizzel van der Snee, Carlijn I Buis, Judith E K R Hentzen, Marjolein E Haveman, Joost M Klaase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Physical Effects, Safety and Feasibility of Prehabilitation in Patients Awaiting Orthotopic Liver Transplantation, a Systematic Review.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multimodal prehabilitation in digestive oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Triage tools to inform the prioritisation of physical health services following a diagnosis of cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prehabilitation: tertiary prevention matters.The British journal of surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura van WijkDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. l.van.wijk@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2805-9488
Lizzel van der SneeDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Carlijn I BuisDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Judith E K R HentzenDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marjolein E HavemanDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joost M KlaaseDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Johnson and Johnson, Medical Devices Company HIP022512, Grant UMCG 2019Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen PPP-2019_009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite improvements in perioperative care, major abdominal surgery continues to be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Accurate preoperative risk stratification and optimisation (prehabilitation) are necessary to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the screening and assessment of modifiable risk factors amendable for prehabilitation interventions and measured the patient compliance rate with recommended interventions.

methodBetween May 2019 and January 2020, patients referred to our hospital for HPB surgery were screened and assessed on six modifiable preoperative risk factors. The risk factors and screening tools used, with cutoff values, included (i) low physical fitness (a 6-min walk test < 82% of patient's calculated norm and/or patient's activity level not meeting the global recommendations on physical activity for health). Patients who were unfit based on the screening were assessed with a cardiopulmonary exercise test (anaerobic threshold ≤ 11 mL/kg/min); (ii) malnutrition (patient-generated subjective global assessment ≥ 4); (iii) iron-deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin < 12 g/dL for women, < 13 g/dL for men and transferrin saturation ≤ 20%); (iv) frailty (Groningen frailty indicator/Robinson frailty score ≥ 4); (v) substance use (smoking and alcohol use of > 5 units per week) and (vi) low psychological resilience (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8). Patients had a consultation with the surgeon on the same day as their screening. High-risk patients were referred for necessary interventions.

resultsOne hundred consecutive patients were screened at our prehabilitation outpatient clinic. The prevalence of high-risk patients per risk factor was 64% for low physical fitness, 42% for malnutrition, 32% for anaemia (in 47% due to iron deficiency), 22% for frailty, 12% for smoking, 18% for alcohol use and 21% for low psychological resilience. Of the 77 patients who were eventually scheduled for surgery, 53 (68.8%) needed at least one intervention, of whom 28 (52.8%) complied with 100% of the necessary interventions. The median (IQR) number of interventions needed in the 77 patients was 1.0 (0-2).

conclusionIt is feasible to screen and assess all patients referred for HPB cancer surgery for six modifiable risk factors. Most of the patients had at least one risk factor that could be optimised. However, compliance with the suggested interventions remains challenging.

Indexed as

PrehabilitationPreoperative care pathwayRisk stratificationScreening

Identifiers

PMID33593437
PMCPMC7887817
OpenAlexW3132192191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.