Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33593327›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

School-based vision screening in Quetta, Pakistan: a qualitative study of experiences of teachers and eye care providers.

Stevens Bechange, Munazza Gillani, Emma Jolley, Robina Iqbal, Leena Ahmed, Muhammed Bilal, Itfaq Khaliq Khan, Sumrana Yasmin, Elena Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stevens BechangeSightsavers Pakistan Country Office, Plot 3-A, Street 7, Sector G-10/2, Islamabad, Pakistan. sbechange@sightsavers.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1125-9993
Munazza GillaniSightsavers Pakistan Country Office, Plot 3-A, Street 7, Sector G-10/2, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Emma JolleySightsavers - United Kingdom, 35 Perrymount Road, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH16 3BW, UK.
Robina Iqbal, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Leena AhmedSightsavers Pakistan Country Office, Plot 3-A, Street 7, Sector G-10/2, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammed BilalSightsavers Pakistan Country Office, Plot 3-A, Street 7, Sector G-10/2, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Itfaq Khaliq KhanSightsavers Pakistan Country Office, Plot 3-A, Street 7, Sector G-10/2, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sumrana YasminSightsavers Pakistan Country Office, Plot 3-A, Street 7, Sector G-10/2, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Elena SchmidtSightsavers - United Kingdom, 35 Perrymount Road, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH16 3BW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual impairment in children is a significant public health problem affecting millions of children globally. Many eye problems experienced by children can be easily diagnosed and treated. We conducted a qualitative study with teachers and optometrists involved in a school-based vision screening programme in Quetta district of Pakistan to explore their experiences of training, vision screening and referrals and to identify factors impacting on the effectiveness of the programme.

methodsBetween April 2018 and June 2018, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 teachers from eight purposefully selected schools with high rates of inaccurate (false positive) referrals. Interviews were also conducted with three optometrists from a not-for profit private eye care hospital that had trained the teachers. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. NVIVO software version 12 was used to code and thematically analyze the data.

resultsFindings suggest that the importance of school-based vision screening was well understood and appreciated by the teachers and optometrists. Most participants felt that there was a strong level of support for the vision screening programme within the participating schools. However, there were a number of operational issues undermining the quality of screening. Eight teachers felt that the duration of the training was insufficient; the training was rushed; six teachers said that the procedures were not sufficiently explained, and the teachers had no time to practice. The screening protocol was not always followed by the teachers. Additionally, many teachers reported being overburdened with other work, which affected both their levels of participation in the training and the time they spent on the screening.

conclusionsSchool-based vision screening by teachers is a cost-effective strategy to detect and treat children's vision impairment early on. In the programme reviewed here however, a significant number of teachers over referred children to ophthalmic services, overwhelming their capacity and undermining the efficiency of the approach. To maximise the effectiveness and efficiency of school-based screening, future initiatives should give sufficient attention to the duration of the teacher training, experience of trainers, support supervision, refresher trainings, regular use of the screening guidelines, and the workload and motivation of those trained.

Indexed as

Teacher TrainingVision ScreeningChildHumansPakistanQualitative ResearchSchoolsChildrenPakistanQualitativeSchool healthSouth AsiaTask shiftingTeachersVision screeningVisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID33593327
PMCPMC7885518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.