Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33593306›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2021

An intersectional gender analysis in kidney transplantation: women who donate a kidney.

Laura Rota-Musoll, Serena Brigidi, Esmeralda Molina-Robles, Ester Oriol-Vila, Laureano Perez-Oller, Mireia Subirana-Casacuberta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gender Differences in Willingness to Be Evaluated for Living Kidney Donation.Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gender and kidney transplantation.Frontiers in nephrology · 2024
    Review
  14. Systems Connected to Inequities in Access to Kidney Transplantation and the Value of Intersectionality.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Inequities in kidney health and kidney care.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura Rota-MusollDepartment of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain.
Serena BrigidiDepartment of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work in the University of Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Catalunya, Spain. serena.brigidi@gmail.com.
Esmeralda Molina-RoblesDepartment of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain.
Ester Oriol-VilaDepartment of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain.
Laureano Perez-OllerDepartment of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain.
Mireia Subirana-CasacubertaResearch group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving-donor transplantation is the best treatment option in patients with chronic kidney failure. Global data show that women are less likely to be kidney recipients than men but are more likely to become living kidney donors. We explored the experience of women who donate a kidney to relatives with biological and socio-cultural ties and to understand the similarities and differences in their experience.

methodsA qualitative hermeneutic phenomenological study with an intersectional analysis of gender. Ten women donors accepted in the transplant evaluation period participated, all of whom donated a kidney to a pre-dialysis relative. Two categories were included: women with biological kinship ties (mothers, sisters) and women who have a socio-cultural relationship (wives) with kidney recipient. The data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsWomen donate their kidneys in a convinced manner, without worrying about their health, with an optimistic and positive attitude, and without believing that they are acting heroically. Women with biological kinship ties see it as a 'naturalization thing'. In contrast, wives donate conditioned by gender roles, but also as a form of empowerment and as a personal benefit: they donate in order to avoid taking on carer role for their husband and as a way of protecting their children.

conclusionThe study's findings expand the conception of kidney donation as solely altruistic and may help professionals to pay attention to the complexity and intersectionality of features present in women who are living kidney donors.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdultAgedAltruismFemaleHumansLiving DonorsMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchWomenGenderIntersectionalityKidney donorLiving donor transplantationQualitative methodology

Identifiers

PMID33593306
PMCPMC7885450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.