ArticleCell transplantation
Co-Transplantation of Haploidentical Stem Cells and a Dose of Unrelated Cord Blood in Pediatric Patients with Thalassemia Major.
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Chinese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of transfusion dependent β-thalassemia (2022)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Guideline
- The shifting global thalassemia burden and lessons from Chineseintegrated control strategy.iScience · 2026Article
- [Guideline for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of transfusion-dependent thalassemia in China (2026)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Article
- A multi-center clinical trial of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in transfusion-dependent thalassemia.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a cure for patients suffering from thalassemia major (TM). Historically, patients were limited by the selection of donors, while the advancement of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) has greatly expanded the donor pool. However, the outcomes of haplo-SCT in TM recipients vary between different programs. In this study, we retrospectively studied 73 pediatric TM patients (median age, 7 years; range, 3 to 14 years) who underwent haplo-cord transplantation. Both the estimated overall survival and transfusion-free survival were 95.26% (CI 95.77% to 96.23%). Neither primary nor secondary graft failures were observed. The median follow-up period was 811 days (range, 370 to 1433 days). Median neutrophil and platelet engraftment times were 22 days (range, 8 to 48 days) and 20 days (range, 8 to 99 days), respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was observed in 52% of patients and of these, 25% developed grade III to IV aGVHD. Cord blood engraftment was associated with delayed immune recovery and increased aGVHD severity. Viral DNAemia occurred in a relatively high proportion of patients but only 7% of patients developed CMV disease, while another 7% of patients had post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Long-term complication outcomes were good. Only one patient developed extensive chronic GVHD. No surviving patients were reliant on blood transfusion by the time this manuscript was submitted. This is one of the largest studies on the outcomes of pediatric TM patients who received stem cell transplantations from alternative donors. The haplo-cord program is safe and practical for TM patients that do not have matched donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.