Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33592625›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Power-law behavior of transcription factor dynamics at the single-molecule level implies a continuum affinity model.

David A Garcia, Gregory Fettweis, Diego M Presman, Ville Paakinaho, Christopher Jarzynski, Arpita Upadhyaya, Gordon L Hager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Current Challenges of Transcription Compartmentalization Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Binding memory of liquid molecules.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David A GarciaLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20893, USA.
Gregory FettweisLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20893, USA.
Diego M PresmanLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20893, USA.
Ville PaakinahoLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20893, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4204-1436
Christopher JarzynskiDepartment of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Arpita UpadhyayaDepartment of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Gordon L HagerLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20893, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9300-5331

Funding

Chromatin Structure and Gene ExpressionZIABC005450 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HAGER, GORDON L · 2009 to 2025
$35.2M
LRBGE Optical Microscopy CoreZICBC011574 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KARPOVA, TATIANA · 2014 to 2025
$7.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule tracking (SMT) allows the study of transcription factor (TF) dynamics in the nucleus, giving important information regarding the diffusion and binding behavior of these proteins in the nuclear environment. Dwell time distributions obtained by SMT for most TFs appear to follow bi-exponential behavior. This has been ascribed to two discrete populations of TFs-one non-specifically bound to chromatin and another specifically bound to target sites, as implied by decades of biochemical studies. However, emerging studies suggest alternate models for dwell-time distributions, indicating the existence of more than two populations of TFs (multi-exponential distribution), or even the absence of discrete states altogether (power-law distribution). Here, we present an analytical pipeline to evaluate which model best explains SMT data. We find that a broad spectrum of TFs (including glucocorticoid receptor, oestrogen receptor, FOXA1, CTCF) follow a power-law distribution of dwell-times, blurring the temporal line between non-specific and specific binding, suggesting that productive binding may involve longer binding events than previously believed. From these observations, we propose a continuum of affinities model to explain TF dynamics, that is consistent with complex interactions of TFs with multiple nuclear domains as well as binding and searching on the chromatin template.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorKineticsMiceModels, BiologicalPhotobleachingProtein BindingReceptors, GlucocorticoidSingle Molecule ImagingTranscription FactorsReceptors, GlucocorticoidTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID33592625
PMCPMC8266587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.