Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33592549›Full record

ReviewClinical imaging2021

Online conferencing software in radiology: Recent trends and utility.

Molly Lieux, Carl Sabottke, Emma R Schachner, Claude Pirtle, Raman Danrad, Bradley Spieler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Molly LieuxLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, 533 Bolivar Street, CSRB Room 661, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States of America. Electronic address: mlieux@lsuhsc.edu.
Carl SabottkeUniversity of Arizona, College of Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, P.O. Box 245067, Tucson, AZ 85724-5067, United States of America.
Emma R SchachnerLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Cell Biology and Anatomy, 1901 Perdido Street, New Orleans, LA 70118, United States of America. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/paleofox.
Claude PirtleWest Tennessee Healthcare, Department of Internal Medicine and Telehealth, 587 Skyline Drive, Jackson, TN 38301, United States of America. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/cpirtlemd.
Raman DanradLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Diagnostic Radiology, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Rm 343, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States of America. Electronic address: rdanra@lsuhsc.edu.
Bradley SpielerLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Diagnostic Radiology, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Rm 343, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States of America. Electronic address: bspie1@lsuhsc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Videoconferencing platforms have recently gained wide attention due to the COVID-19 pandemic, both within and outside of the medical community. This article reviews various applications of online meeting technology to the radiologic community, not only in response to the recent pandemic but also thereafter. Various platform features are outlined and discussed, specifically with respect to collaboration, training, and patient care. Platforms reviewed are GoToMeeting, Microsoft Teams, Skype, WebEx, and Zoom.

Indexed as

COVID-19RadiologyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SoftwareCollaborationRadiologyVideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID33592549
PMCPMC9758695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.