Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33592441›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)2021

Prenatal exposure to mixtures of persistent endocrine disrupting chemicals and early menarche in a population-based cohort of British girls.

Kristin J Marks, Penelope P Howards, Melissa M Smarr, W Dana Flanders, Kate Northstone, Johnni H Daniel, Antonia M Calafat, Andreas Sjödin, Michele Marcus, Terryl J Hartman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin J MarksDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States; National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, United States. Electronic address: kristin.marks@emory.edu.
Penelope P HowardsDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Melissa M SmarrGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
W Dana FlandersDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States; National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Kate NorthstoneDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Johnni H DanielNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Antonia M CalafatNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Andreas SjödinNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Michele MarcusDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States; Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Terryl J HartmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States; National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USEmory University · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is ubiquitous. EDC exposure, especially during critical periods of development like the prenatal window, may interfere with the body's endocrine system, which can affect growth and developmental outcomes such as puberty. Most studies have examined one EDC at a time in relation to disease; however, humans are exposed to many EDCs. By studying mixtures, the human experience can be more closely replicated. We investigated the association of prenatal exposure to persistent EDCs (poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs)) as mixtures with early menarche among female offspring in a nested case-control study within the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) recruited in the United Kingdom in 1991-1992. Concentrations of 52 EDCs were quantified in maternal serum samples collected during pregnancy. Daughter's age at menarche was ascertained through mailed questionnaires sent annually. We used repeated holdout weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) to examine the association between prenatal exposure to multiple EDCs and early menarche (<11.5 (n = 218) vs. ≥11.5 years (n = 230)) for each chemical class separately (PFAS, PCBs, and OCPs) and for all three classes combined. Models adjusted for maternal age at menarche, maternal education, parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index, maternal age, prenatal smoking, and gestational week at sample collection. Mixture models showed null associations between prenatal exposure to EDC mixtures and early menarche. Using WQS regression, the odds ratio for early menarche for a one-decile increase in chemical concentrations for all three classes combined was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.05); using BKMR, the odds ratio when all exposures were at the 60th percentile compared to the median was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.05). Results suggest the overall effect of prenatal exposure to persistent EDC mixtures is not associated with early menarche.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PollutantsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsBayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaternal ExposureMenarchePregnancyUnited KingdomEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PollutantsALSPACMenarcheOrganochlorine pesticidesPoly- and perfluoroalkyl substancesPolychlorinated biphenylsPuberty

Identifiers

PMID33592441
PMCPMC8111784
OpenAlexW3126731013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.