Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33592340›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2021

Effectiveness of anakinra for tocilizumab-refractory severe COVID-19: A single-centre retrospective comparative study.

Cristina de la Calle, Francisco López-Medrano, José Luis Pablos, Jaime Lora-Tamayo, Guillermo Maestro-de la Calle, Marcos Sánchez-Fernández, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, María Asunción Pérez-Jacoiste Asín, José Manuel Caro-Teller, Rocío García-García and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Current evidence on the use of anakinra in COVID-19.International immunopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina de la CalleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Francisco López-MedranoUnit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Spain. Electronic address: flmedrano@yahoo.es.
José Luis PablosDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Spain.
Jaime Lora-TamayoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo Maestro-de la CalleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Marcos Sánchez-FernándezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Mario Fernández-RuizUnit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
María Asunción Pérez-Jacoiste AsínDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
José Manuel Caro-TellerDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Rocío García-GarcíaDepartment of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes CatalánDepartment of Intensive Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Joaquín Martínez-LópezDepartment of Hematology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), CNIO, Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Spain.
Ángel SevillanoDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Julia OrigüenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Mar RipollDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Rafael San JuanUnit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Spain.
Antonio LaluezaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Borja de MiguelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Octavio CarreteroUnit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Fernando AguilarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Carlos GómezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Estela Paz-ArtalDepartment of Immunology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Héctor BuenoDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Carlos LumbrerasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Spain.
José María AguadoUnit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Spain.
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESSpanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA subgroup of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection was thought to have developed cytokine release syndrome and were treated with tocilizumab; however, a significant percentage of patients evolved. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of anakinra as a rescue treatment for patients with tocilizumab-refractory COVID-19 disease.

methodsA prospective cohort of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received anakinra as salvage therapy after failure of tocilizumab were compared (1:1) with selected controls in a historical cohort of patients treated with tocilizumab. Cases and controls were matched by age, comorbidities, pulse oximetry oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) ratio at baseline, and time elapsed since the initiation of treatment with tocilizumab. The primary outcome was the improvement in clinical status measured by a 6-point ordinal scale, from baseline to day 21.

resultsThe study included 20 cases and 20 controls (mean age 65.3 ± 12.8 years, 65% males). No differences were found in the clinical improvement rates at 7, 14 and 21 days of follow-up. The in-hospital mortality rate for patients receiving anakinra was 55% vs. 45% in the control group (P = 0.527).

conclusionsTreatment with anakinra was not useful in improving the prognosis of patients with tocilizumab-refractory severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesCOVID-19Cytokine Release SyndromeFemaleHospital MortalityHumansImmunomodulationInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteintocilizumabAnakinraCOVID-19ImmunomodulationOutcomeTherapyTocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID33592340
PMCPMC7881693
OpenAlexW3133126189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.