Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33592293›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2021

Epidemiology of endovascular and open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States from 2004 to 2015 and implications for screening.

Kirsten D Dansey, Rens R B Varkevisser, Nicholas J Swerdlow, Chun Li, Livia E V M de Guerre, Patric Liang, Christina Marcaccio, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Brett J Carroll, Marc L Schermerhorn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ten years of physician-modified endografts.Journal of vascular surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. When Endovascular Interventions for Endoleaks Fail.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Vascular Anastomoses and Dissection: A Six-Part Simulation Curriculum for Surgical Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  18. How we do a mini-retroperitoneal approach for infrarenal aortoiliac aneurysm.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsten D DanseyDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Rens R B VarkevisserDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Nicholas J SwerdlowDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Chun LiDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Livia E V M de GuerreDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Patric LiangDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Christina MarcaccioDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Thomas F X O'DonnellDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Brett J CarrollDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Marc L SchermerhornDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston. Electronic address: mscherm@bidmc.harvard.edu.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

HARVARD-LONGWOOD RESEARCH TRAINING IN VASCULAR SURGERYT32HL007734 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI FERRAN, CHRISTIANE, LOGERFO, FRANK W · 1993 to 2023
$10.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContemporary national trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and intact AAAs are relatively unknown. Furthermore, screening is only covered by insurance for patients aged 65 to 75 years with a family history of AAAs and for men with a positive smoking history. It is unclear what proportion of patients who present with a ruptured AAA would have been candidates for screening.

methodsUsing the National Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2015, we identified ruptured and intact AAA admissions and repairs using the International Classification of Diseases codes. We generated the screening-eligible cohort using previously identified proportions of male smokers (87%) and all patients with a family history of AAAs (10%) and applied these proportions to patients aged 65 to 75 years. We accounted for those who could have had a previous AAA diagnosis (17%), either from screening or an incidental detection in patients aged >75 years who had presented with AAA rupture. The primary outcomes were treatment and in-hospital mortality between patients meeting the criteria for screening vs those who did not.

resultsWe evaluated 65,125 admissions for ruptured AAAs and 461,191 repairs for intact AAAs. Overall, an estimated 45,037 admitted patients (68%) and 25,777 patients who had undergone repair for ruptured AAAs (59%) did not meet the criteria for screening. Of the patients who did not qualify, 27,653 (63%) were aged >75 years, 10,603 (24%) were aged <65 years, and 16,103 (36%) were women. Endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) increased for ruptured AAAs from 10% in 2004 to 55% in 2015 (P < .001), with operative mortality of 35%. EVAR increased for intact AAAs from 45% in 2004 to 83% in 2015 (P < .001), with operative mortality of 2.0%.

conclusionsMost patients who had undergone repair for ruptured AAAs did not qualify for screening. EVAR was the primary treatment of both ruptured and intact AAAs with relatively low in-hospital mortality. Therefore, expansion of the screening criteria to include selected women and a wider age range should be considered.

Indexed as

AgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationClinical Decision-MakingDatabases, FactualDiagnostic Screening ProgramsEligibility DeterminationFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMalePatient AdmissionPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAAA screeningAbdominal aortic aneurysm outcomesEndovascular

Identifiers

PMID33592293
PMCPMC8316377
OpenAlexW3130073458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.