Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33592272›Full record

ReviewPharmacological research2021

International policies and challenges on the legalization of traditional medicine/herbal medicines in the fight against COVID-19.

Yin Xiong, Min Gao, Bert van Duijn, Hoyoung Choi, Frits van Horssen, Mei Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Bioactive Profiling ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Effect ofInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yin XiongFaculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China; Fytagoras B.V., Leiden 2333BE, The Netherlands; Leiden University-European Center for Chinese Medicine and Natural Compounds, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden 2333BE, The Netherlands. Electronic address: yhsiung@163.com.
Min GaoFaculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Bert van DuijnFytagoras B.V., Leiden 2333BE, The Netherlands; Plant Biodynamics Laboratory, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden 2333BE, The Netherlands; Science Department, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg 4331CB, The Netherlands.
Hoyoung ChoiCollege of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.
Frits van HorssenFytagoras B.V., Leiden 2333BE, The Netherlands; Mydisun Chemical Company B.V., The Hague 2595AM, The Netherlands.
Mei WangLeiden University-European Center for Chinese Medicine and Natural Compounds, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden 2333BE, The Netherlands; SU Biomedicine B.V., Leiden 2333BE, The Netherlands. Electronic address: mei.wang@subiomedicine.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has now rapidly spread around the world, causing an outbreak of acute infectious pneumonia. To develop effective and safe therapies for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 has become the major global public health concern. Traditional medicine (TM)/herbal medicines (HMs) have been used to treat multiple epidemics in human history, which brings hope for the fight against COVID-19 in some areas. For example, in China, India, and South Korea with traditional medication history and theory, the governments issued a series of guidelines to support TM/HMs in the medication of COVID-19. In contrast, other countries e.g. North American and European governments are typically silent on these practices, unless to warn of possible harm and overselling. Such difference is due to the discrepancy in culture, history and philosophical views of health care and medication, as well as unharmonized policies and standards in the regulation and legalization of TM/HMs among different areas. Herein, we reviewed the responses and scientific researches from seven selected countries on the policies and legalization of TM/HMs to treat COVID-19, and also analyzed the major challenges and concerns to utilize the traditional knowledge and resource.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentMedicine, TraditionalAntiviral AgentsComplementary TherapiesCOVID-19Drug ApprovalGlobal HealthHealthcare DisparitiesHumansPlant PreparationsPolicy MakingAntiviral AgentsPlant PreparationsCOVID-19Herbal medicinesLegalizationPolicyTraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID33592272
PMCPMC7882224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.