Trial reportCancer research and treatment2021
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Guided Bladder-Sparing Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of a Pilot Phase II Study.
Trial report in Cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07043543 (Randomized Open Phase II Multienter Study Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in Bladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Open Phase II Multienter Study Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in Bladder Cancer
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of bladder.Investigative and clinical urology · 2022Trial
- Article
- Review
- Evaluation of Event-Free Survival as a Surrogate Endpoint for Overall Survival in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Oncology and therapy · 2025Article
- Recent Advances and Future Directions in Bladder Preservation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Review
- Identification of Molecular Subgroups of Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer and Their Impact on Treatment Outcome.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- An ensemble learning model for predicting cancer-specific survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients undergoing bladder preservation therapy.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Downstaging guided neoadjuvant strategy shift and bladder preservation in locally advanced bladder cancer: A case report.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Editorial: Organ-sparing surgery for genitourinary cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical efficacy analysis of partial cystectomy and radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive sarcomatoid carcinoma of the urinary bladder.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Survival after sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by trimodal treatment or radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Health-related quality of life after curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- A comparative analysis of radical cystectomy with perioperative chemotherapy, chemoradiation therapy, or systemic therapy in patients with clinically advanced node-positive bladder cancer (cN2/N3).Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Disease Management of Clinical Complete Responders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Review of Literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- The importance of maximal TURBT in trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeReduced quality of life after cystectomy has made bladder preservation a popular research topic for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Previous research has indicated significant tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) was performed before NAC to define the pathology, impacting the real evaluation of NAC. This research aimed to assess real NAC efficacy without interference from TURBT and apply combined modality therapies guided by NAC efficacy. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC were confirmed by cystoscopic biopsy and imaging. NAC efficacy was assessed by imaging, urine cytology, and cystoscopy with multidisciplinary team discussion. Definite responders (≤ T1) underwent TURBT plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Incomplete responders underwent radical cystectomy or partial cystectomy if feasible. The primary endpoint was the bladder preservation rate.
resultsFifty-nine patients were enrolled, and the median age was 63 years. Patients with cT3-4 accounted for 75%. The median number of NAC cycles was three. Definite responders were 52.5%. The complete response (CR) was 10.2%, and 59.3% of patients received bladder-sparing treatments. With a median follow-up of 44.6 months, the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 72.8%. Three-year OS and relapse-free survival were 88.4% and 60.0% in the bladder-sparing group but only 74.3% and 37.5% in the cystectomy group. The evaluations of preserved bladder function were satisfactory.
conclusionAfter stratifying MIBC patients by NAC efficacy, definite responders achieved a satisfactory bladder-sparing rate, prognosis, and bladder function. The CR rate reflected the real NAC efficacy for MIBC. This therapy is worth verifying through multicenter research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.