ArticlePloS one2021
HDSI: High dimensional selection with interactions algorithm on feature selection and testing.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting AI Interpretability in Precision Oncology: Why Predictive Accuracy Does Not Ensure Stable Feature Importance.Cancers · 2026Article
- Interpretable multimodal machine learning for diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The impact of Bayesian optimization on feature selection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Toward precision medicine using a "digital twin" approach: modeling the onset of disease-specific brain atrophy in individuals with multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- LASSO Regression with Multiple Imputations for the Selection of Key Variables Affecting the Fatty Acid Profile ofMarine drugs · 2023Article
- Toward Precision Medicine Using a "Digital Twin" Approach: Modeling the Onset of Disease-Specific Brain Atrophy in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis.Research square · 2023Article
- PIntMF: Penalized Integrative Matrix Factorization method for multi-omics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feature selection on high dimensional data along with the interaction effects is a critical challenge for classical statistical learning techniques. Existing feature selection algorithms such as random LASSO leverages LASSO capability to handle high dimensional data. However, the technique has two main limitations, namely the inability to consider interaction terms and the lack of a statistical test for determining the significance of selected features. This study proposes a High Dimensional Selection with Interactions (HDSI) algorithm, a new feature selection method, which can handle high-dimensional data, incorporate interaction terms, provide the statistical inferences of selected features and leverage the capability of existing classical statistical techniques. The method allows the application of any statistical technique like LASSO and subset selection on multiple bootstrapped samples; each contains randomly selected features. Each bootstrap data incorporates interaction terms for the randomly sampled features. The selected features from each model are pooled and their statistical significance is determined. The selected statistically significant features are used as the final output of the approach, whose final coefficients are estimated using appropriate statistical techniques. The performance of HDSI is evaluated using both simulated data and real studies. In general, HDSI outperforms the commonly used algorithms such as LASSO, subset selection, adaptive LASSO, random LASSO and group LASSO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.