Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591979›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

An open label, block randomized, community study of the safety and efficacy of co-administered ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in India.

Purushothaman Jambulingam, Vijesh Sreedhar Kuttiatt, Kaliannagounder Krishnamoorthy, Swaminathan Subramanian, Adinarayanan Srividya, Hari Kishan K Raju, Manju Rahi, Roopali K Somani, Mallanna K Suryaprakash, Gangeshwar P Dwivedi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Shrinking the lymphatic filariasis map of Zimbabwe: Reassessing the population requiring treatment through confirmatory mapping.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Accelerating Progress Towards the 2030 Neglected Tropical Diseases Targets: How Can Quantitative Modeling Support Programmatic Decisions?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Predictive Value of Microfilariae-Based Stop-MDA Thresholds After Triple Drug Therapy With IDA Against Lymphatic Filariasis in Treatment-Naive Indian Settings.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Purushothaman JambulingamICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0962-6953
Vijesh Sreedhar KuttiattICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8435-218X
Kaliannagounder KrishnamoorthyICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Swaminathan SubramanianICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0804-0763
Adinarayanan SrividyaICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6105-4297
Hari Kishan K RajuICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Manju RahiIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0932-0935
Roopali K SomaniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8309-1304
Mallanna K SuryaprakashDistrict Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme, Yadgiri, Karnataka, India.
Gangeshwar P DwivediConsultant (Project), Yamuna Vihar, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Gary J WeilWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6336-3824
Vector Control Research Centre · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INNational Institute Of Veterinary Epidemiology And Disease Informatics · INNizam's Institute of Medical Sciences · INWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetter drug regimens for mass drug administration (MDA) could accelerate the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (LF). This community study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of MDA with IDA (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and albendazole) or DA (diethylcarbamazine and albendazole) in India. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis two-armed, open-labelled, block randomised, community study was conducted in LF endemic villages in Yadgir district, Karnataka, India. Consenting participants ≥5 years of age were tested for circulating filarial antigenemia (CFA) and microfilaremia (Mf) before treatment with a single oral dose of IDA or DA. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored actively for two days and passively for five more days. Persons with positive CFA or Mf tests at baseline were retested 12-months post-treatment to assess treatment efficacy. Baseline CFA and Mf-rates were 26.4% and 6.9% in IDA and 24.5% and 6.4% in DA villages respectively. 4758 and 4160 participants received IDA and DA. Most AEs were mild after both treatments; fewer than 0.1% of participants experienced AEs with severity > grade 1. No serious AEs were observed. Fever, headache and dizziness were the most common AEs. AE rates were slightly higher after IDA than DA (8.3% vs. 6.4%, P<0.01). AEs were more frequent in females and Mf-positives after either treatment, but significantly more frequent after IDA (40.5% vs 20.2%, P < 0.001). IDA was more effective for clearing Mf than DA (84% vs. 61.8%, P < 0.001). Geometric mean Mf counts per 60μl in retested Mf-positives decreased by 96.4% from 11.8 after IDA and by 90.0% from 9.5 after DA. Neither treatment was effective for clearing CFA. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IDA had an acceptable safety profile and was more effective for clearing Mf than DA. With adequate compliance and medical support to manage AEs, IDA has the potential to accelerate LF elimination in India.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI No/2016/10/007399).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlbendazoleAnimalsChildDiethylcarbamazineDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleFilaricidesHumansIndiaIvermectinMaleMass Drug AdministrationWuchereria bancroftiAlbendazoleDiethylcarbamazineFilaricidesIvermectin

Identifiers

PMID33591979
PMCPMC7909694
OpenAlexW3128450674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.