ArticlePloS one2021
PI Prob: A risk prediction and clinical guidance system for evaluating patients with recurrent infections.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Differences in immunoglobulin utilization when treating patients with primary immune disease in the United States.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Proceedings of the second Artificial Intelligence in Primary Immunodeficiency (AIPI) meeting.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Current perspectives and challenges of using artificial intelligence in immunodeficiencies.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Inborn Errors of Immunity Identification and Management: Past, Present, and Future-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Decoding Immunodeficiencies with Artificial Intelligence: A New Era of Precision Medicine.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Large scale causal modeling to identify adults at risk for combined and common variable immunodeficiencies.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- New tools for diagnosis of primary immunodeficiencies: from awareness to artificial intelligence.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Navigating disruption in the PID landscape: embracing opportunities and anticipating threats in the next ten years.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Advancing equity in allergy and immunology: progress, pitfalls, and the path forward.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
- Building alliances for early detection of immunodeficiencies: from primary care to hematology.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Development of an Expert-Based Scoring System for Early Identification of Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity in Primary Care Settings - the PIDCAP Project.Journal of clinical immunology · 2024Article
- Objectivizing issues in the diagnosis of complex rare diseases: lessons learned from testing existing diagnosis support systems on ciliopathies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Natural language processing of clinical notes enables early inborn error of immunity risk ascertainment.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024Article
- Proceedings from the inaugural Artificial Intelligence in Primary Immune Deficiencies (AIPID) conference.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024Article
- Performance and clinical utility of a new supervised machine-learning pipeline in detecting rare ciliopathy patients based on deep phenotyping from electronic health records and semantic similarity.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Piloting an automated query and scoring system to facilitate APDS patient identification from health systems.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Large-scale deep learning analysis to identify adult patients at risk for combined and common variable immunodeficiencies.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care.Journal of clinical immunology · 2023Article
- Who's your data? Primary immune deficiency differential diagnosis prediction via machine learning and data mining of the USIDNET registry.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary immunodeficiency diseases represent an expanding set of heterogeneous conditions which are difficult to recognize clinically. Diagnostic rates outside of the newborn period have not changed appreciably. This concern underscores a need for novel methods of disease detection.
objectiveWe built a Bayesian network to provide real-time risk assessment about primary immunodeficiency and to facilitate prescriptive analytics for initiating the most appropriate diagnostic work up. Our goal is to improve diagnostic rates for primary immunodeficiency and shorten time to diagnosis. We aimed to use readily available health record data and a small training dataset to prove utility in diagnosing patients with relatively rare features.
methodsWe extracted data from the Texas Children's Hospital electronic health record on a large population of primary immunodeficiency patients (n = 1762) and appropriately-matched set of controls (n = 1698). From the cohorts, clinically relevant prior probabilities were calculated enabling construction of a Bayesian network probabilistic model(PI Prob). Our model was constructed with clinical-immunology domain expertise, trained on a balanced cohort of 100 cases-controls and validated on an unseen balanced cohort of 150 cases-controls. Performance was measured by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC). We also compared our network performance to classic machine learning model performance on the same dataset.
resultsPI Prob was accurate in classifying immunodeficiency patients from controls (AUROC = 0.945; p<0.0001) at a risk threshold of ≥6%. Additionally, the model was 89% accurate for categorizing validation cohort members into appropriate International Union of Immunological Societies diagnostic categories. Our network outperformed 3 other machine learning models and provides superior transparency with a prescriptive output element.
conclusionArtificial intelligence methods can classify risk for primary immunodeficiency and guide management. PI Prob enables accurate, objective decision making about risk and guides the user towards the appropriate diagnostic evaluation for patients with recurrent infections. Probabilistic models can be trained with small datasets underscoring their utility for rare disease detection given appropriate domain expertise for feature selection and network construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.