Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591968›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Spec2Vec: Improved mass spectral similarity scoring through learning of structural relationships.

Florian Huber, Lars Ridder, Stefan Verhoeven, Jurriaan H Spaaks, Faruk Diblen, Simon Rogers, Justin J J van der Hooft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florian HuberNetherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3535-9406
Lars RidderNetherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7635-9533
Stefan VerhoevenNetherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5821-2060
Jurriaan H SpaaksNetherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7064-4069
Faruk DiblenNetherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0989-929X
Simon RogersSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-4477
Justin J J van der HooftBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-5511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectral similarity is used as a proxy for structural similarity in many tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) based metabolomics analyses such as library matching and molecular networking. Although weaknesses in the relationship between spectral similarity scores and the true structural similarities have been described, little development of alternative scores has been undertaken. Here, we introduce Spec2Vec, a novel spectral similarity score inspired by a natural language processing algorithm-Word2Vec. Spec2Vec learns fragmental relationships within a large set of spectral data to derive abstract spectral embeddings that can be used to assess spectral similarities. Using data derived from GNPS MS/MS libraries including spectra for nearly 13,000 unique molecules, we show how Spec2Vec scores correlate better with structural similarity than cosine-based scores. We demonstrate the advantages of Spec2Vec in library matching and molecular networking. Spec2Vec is computationally more scalable allowing structural analogue searches in large databases within seconds.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene LibraryComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualFalse Positive ReactionsMachine LearningMetabolomicsNatural Language ProcessingReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID33591968
PMCPMC7909622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.