Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591798›Full record

SynthesisJCO global oncology2021

Receptor-Defined Breast Cancer in Five East African Countries and Its Implications for Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pallvi Popli, Elane M Gutterman, Coral Omene, Shridar Ganesan, Douglas Mills, Richard Marlink

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JCO global oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast Cancer Histopathology in the Age of Molecular Oncology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pallvi PopliRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-2830-6349
Elane M GuttermanRutgers Global Health Institute, New Brunswick, NJ.
Coral OmeneDivision of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0001-7824-1478
Shridar GanesanDivision of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-5404-3044
Douglas MillsIndependent Statistics Contractor, Plainsboro, NJ.
Richard MarlinkRutgers Global Health Institute, and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) are determinants of treatment and mortality for patients with breast cancer (BC). In East Africa, the estimated 5-year survival (37.7%) is far lower than the US average (90%). This meta-analysis investigates BC receptor subtypes within five East African countries to ascertain cross-country patterns and prioritize treatment needs.

methodsFrom a PubMed search, January 1, 1998-June 30, 2019, for all English-only BC articles for Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda, eligible studies had receptor distributions for female BC samples ≥ 30 patients. Outcomes were proportions of ER+, PR+, and HER2-positive (HER2+), and/or molecular subtypes. Data included study characteristics and mean or median patient age. Using

resultsAmong 36 BC studies with receptor data, 21 met criteria. Weighted mean age was 47.5 years and median, 48. Overall ES were as follows: 55% for ER-positive (ER+) (95% CI, 47 to 62), 23% for HER2+ (95% CI, 20 to 26), and 27% for triple-negative BC (TNBC) (95% CI, 23 to 32).

conclusionWe found differences between countries, for example, lower distribution of TNBC in Ethiopia (21%) compared with Uganda (35%). ER+, the dominant BC subtype overall at 55%, emphasizes the need to prioritize endocrine therapy. Overall proportions of HER2+ BC (with or without ER+ or PR+), 23%, approached proportions of TNBC, 27%, yet HER2 testing and treatment were infrequent. Testing and reporting of receptor subtypes would promote delivery of more effective treatment reducing the mortality disparity.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsEthiopiaFemaleHumansKenyaMiddle AgedRwandaTanzaniaUgandaBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID33591798
PMCPMC8081496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.