Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591624›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Phone calls for improving blood pressure control among hypertensive patients attending private medical practitioners in India: Findings from Mumbai hypertension project.

Mandar Kannure, Asha Hegde, Anupam Khungar-Pathni, Bhawna Sharma, Angelo Scuteri, Dinesh Neupane, Ravdeep Kaur Gandhi, Haresh Patel, Sapna Surendran, Vaishnavi Jondhale and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Mandar KannurePATH, New Delhi, India.
Asha HegdePATH, New Delhi, India.
Anupam Khungar-PathniResolve to Save Lives, New York, NY, USA.
Bhawna SharmaResolve to Save Lives, New York, NY, USA.
Angelo ScuteriLancet Commission on Hypertension Group.
Dinesh NeupaneLancet Commission on Hypertension Group.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-2990
Ravdeep Kaur GandhiPATH, New Delhi, India.
Haresh PatelPATH, New Delhi, India.
Sapna SurendranPATH, New Delhi, India.
Vaishnavi JondhalePATH, New Delhi, India.
Suman GuptaPATH, New Delhi, India.
Ajit PhalakePATH, New Delhi, India.
Vrushal WalkarPATH, New Delhi, India.
Roshini GeorgePATH, New Delhi, India.
Helen McguirePATH, New Delhi, India.
Neeraj JainPATH, New Delhi, India.
Shibu VijayanPATH, New Delhi, India.
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · INJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of effective medication, blood pressure control rates are low, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Adherence to medication and follow-up visits are important factors in blood pressure control. This study assessed the effectiveness of reminder telephone calls on follow-up visits and blood pressure control among hypertensive patients as part of the Mumbai Hypertension Project. This project was initiated by PATH with the support from Resolve to Save Lives from January 2019 to February 2020. The study included hypertensive patients attending 164 private practices in Mumbai, India; practitioners screened all adults visiting their clinic during the project period. Among 13 184 hypertensive patients registered, the mean age was 53 years (SD = 12.38) and 52% were female. Among the 11 544 patients that provided phone numbers and gave consent for follow-up calls, 9528 responded to phone calls at least once and 5250 patients followed up at least once. Of the 5250 patients, 82% visited the clinic for follow-up visit within one month after receiving the phone call. The blood pressure control rate among those who answered phone calls and who did not answer phone calls increased from 23.6% to 48.8% (P <.001) and 21.0% to 44.3% (P <.001), respectively. The blood pressure control rate at follow-up was significantly associated with phone calls (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.34 - 1.71). The study demonstrates that telephone call intervention and follow-up visits can improve patient retention in care and, subsequently, blood pressure control among hypertensive patients attending urban private sector clinics in India.

Indexed as

HypertensionAdultBlood PressureFemaleHumansIndiaMiddle AgedTelephoneblood pressure control | follow-up visit | mHealth | Mumbai Hypertension Project | phone calls| India

Identifiers

PMID33591624
PMCPMC8678825
OpenAlexW3130637607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.