SynthesisNeurocritical care2021
Structure and Outcomes of Educational Programs for Training Non-electroencephalographers in Performing and Screening Adult EEG: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of therapeutic management practices in generalized and focal motor status epilepticus: An international survey in French, Belgian, and Swiss intensive care units.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Education Research: EEG Instruction: Findings from a Scoping Review.Neurology. Education · 2025Article
- Continuous EEG Monitoring in Canadian Hospitals: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Education Research: Current State and Effectiveness of EEG Education for Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurology. Education · 2025Article
- Expert opinions on pediatric EEG training for non-epilepsy specialists in sub-Saharan Africa.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025Article
- Competence of healthcare professionals performing electroencephalography test: A systematic review.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Review
- Challenges and Prospects in Epilepsy Monitoring Units: A Comprehensive Review of Logistic Barriers.Cureus · 2024Review
- Electrophysiological monitoring of neurological functions at the acute phase of brain injury: An overview of current knowledge and future perspectives in the adult population.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2024Review
- Electroencephalogram in the intensive care unit: a focused look at acute brain injury.Intensive care medicine · 2022Review
- Quantitative EEG-Based Seizure Estimation in Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus.Neurocritical care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo qualitatively and quantitatively summarize curricula, teaching methods, and effectiveness of educational programs for training bedside care providers (non-experts) in the performance and screening of adult electroencephalography (EEG) for nonconvulsive seizures and other patterns.
methodsPRISMA methodological standards were followed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, WOS, Scopus, and MedEdPORTAL databases were searched from inception until February 26, 2020 with no restrictions. Abstract and full-text review was completed in duplicate. Studies were included if they were original research; involved non-experts performing, troubleshooting, or screening adult EEG; and provided qualitative descriptions of curricula and teaching methods and/or quantitative assessment of non-experts (vs gold standard EEG performance by neurodiagnostic technologists or interpretation by neurophysiologists). Data were extracted in duplicate. A content analysis and a meta-narrative review were performed.
resultsOf 2430 abstracts, 35 studies were included. Sensitivity and specificity of seizure identification varied from 38 to 100% and 65 to 100% for raw EEG; 40 to 93% and 38 to 95% for quantitative EEG, and 95 to 100% and 65 to 85% for sonified EEG, respectively. Non-expert performance of EEG resulted in statistically significant reduced delay (86 min, p < 0.0001; 196 min, p < 0.0001; 667 min, p < 0.005) in EEG completion and changes in management in approximately 40% of patients. Non-experts who were trained included physicians, nurses, neurodiagnostic technicians, and medical students. Numerous teaching methods were utilized and often combined, with instructional and hands-on training being most common.
conclusionsSeveral different bedside providers can be educated to perform and screen adult EEG, particularly for the purpose of diagnosing nonconvulsive seizures. While further rigorous research is warranted, this review demonstrates several potential bridges by which EEG may be integrated into the care of critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33591537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.