Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591537›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2021

Structure and Outcomes of Educational Programs for Training Non-electroencephalographers in Performing and Screening Adult EEG: A Systematic Review.

Julie Kromm, Kirsten M Fiest, Ayham Alkhachroum, Colin Josephson, Andreas Kramer, Nathalie Jette

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expert opinions on pediatric EEG training for non-epilepsy specialists in sub-Saharan Africa.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie KrommDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Room 04112, Foothills Medical Centre, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 5A1, Canada. julie.kromm@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8850-9095
Kirsten M FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Room 04112, Foothills Medical Centre, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 5A1, Canada.
Ayham AlkhachroumNeurocritical Care Division, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
Colin JosephsonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Andreas KramerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Room 04112, Foothills Medical Centre, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 5A1, Canada.
Nathalie JetteDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo qualitatively and quantitatively summarize curricula, teaching methods, and effectiveness of educational programs for training bedside care providers (non-experts) in the performance and screening of adult electroencephalography (EEG) for nonconvulsive seizures and other patterns.

methodsPRISMA methodological standards were followed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, WOS, Scopus, and MedEdPORTAL databases were searched from inception until February 26, 2020 with no restrictions. Abstract and full-text review was completed in duplicate. Studies were included if they were original research; involved non-experts performing, troubleshooting, or screening adult EEG; and provided qualitative descriptions of curricula and teaching methods and/or quantitative assessment of non-experts (vs gold standard EEG performance by neurodiagnostic technologists or interpretation by neurophysiologists). Data were extracted in duplicate. A content analysis and a meta-narrative review were performed.

resultsOf 2430 abstracts, 35 studies were included. Sensitivity and specificity of seizure identification varied from 38 to 100% and 65 to 100% for raw EEG; 40 to 93% and 38 to 95% for quantitative EEG, and 95 to 100% and 65 to 85% for sonified EEG, respectively. Non-expert performance of EEG resulted in statistically significant reduced delay (86 min, p < 0.0001; 196 min, p < 0.0001; 667 min, p < 0.005) in EEG completion and changes in management in approximately 40% of patients. Non-experts who were trained included physicians, nurses, neurodiagnostic technicians, and medical students. Numerous teaching methods were utilized and often combined, with instructional and hands-on training being most common.

conclusionsSeveral different bedside providers can be educated to perform and screen adult EEG, particularly for the purpose of diagnosing nonconvulsive seizures. While further rigorous research is warranted, this review demonstrates several potential bridges by which EEG may be integrated into the care of critically ill patients.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyPhysiciansAdultClinical CompetenceHumansSeizuresSensitivity and SpecificityCritical careEducationElectroencephalographyIntensive care unitSeizure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.