Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591479›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Recurrences is Safe and Efficacious.

Shachar Laks, Gal Schtrechman, Mohammad Adileh, Almog Ben-Yaacov, Ofer Purim, Vyacheslav Ivanov, Dan Aderka, Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Naama Halpern, Shani Goren and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shachar LaksDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Tel Hashomer Medical Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. slaksmd@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-453X
Gal SchtrechmanDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Tel Hashomer Medical Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Mohammad AdilehDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Tel Hashomer Medical Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Almog Ben-YaacovDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Tel Hashomer Medical Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ofer PurimDepartment of Oncology, Assuta Samson Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
Vyacheslav IvanovDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Tel Hashomer Medical Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Dan AderkaAffiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Einat Shacham-ShmueliAffiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Naama HalpernAffiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Shani GorenDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Tel Hashomer Medical Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Daria PerelsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Aviram NissanDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Tel Hashomer Medical Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is associated with improved survival in patients with historically dismal prognosis. Nonetheless, peritoneal recurrences remain common and represent a difficult challenge in these patients' management. Repeat CRS/HIPEC is associated with even greater morbidity and its survival benefit has not yet been clearly demonstrated.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database and aimed to assess the safety and oncological efficacy of repeat CRS/HIPEC.

resultsTwo hundred thirty-two patients underwent an initial CRS/HIPEC, whereas 30 subsequently had repeat CRS/HIPEC for CRPM. Groups were similar in demographics, comorbidities, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI). No significant difference in morbidity, hospital stay, or reoperation rate was noted between initial and repeat procedures. Patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC had a median overall survival of 68 months versus 51 months in patients who did not undergo repeat procedure for their peritoneal recurrence (p = 0.03). Disease-free survival (DFS) in patients after repeat and after initial procedure were similar with median of 9.6 versus 12 months, respectively (p = 0.083). Univariate analysis demonstrated that PCI, DFS, and repeat procedure displayed significant factors on outcomes in patients with peritoneal recurrences, whereas PCI > 16 and DFS remained independent predictors on multivariable analysis.

conclusionsOur analysis, which represents the largest series to date of repeat CRS/HIPEC for CRPM, indicates that this approach as a part of multimodal therapy is both safe and efficacious in appropriately selected patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedPeritoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.