Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591470›Full record

SynthesisJapanese journal of ophthalmology2021

Systematic review of clinical research on regenerative medicine for the cornea.

Yoshinori Oie, Shimpei Komoto, Ryo Kawasaki

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshinori OieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Room E7, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. yoie@ophthal.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Shimpei KomotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Room E7, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Ryo KawasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Room E7, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo conduct a systematic review of clinical research on the use of regenerative medicine for the cornea in human patients.

methodsA systematic literature search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library was performed in May 2020.

resultsForty-two articles were identified. Thirty-eight of those articles focused on the treatment for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), of which 17 articles involved autologous cultured limbal epithelial cell sheet transplantation (CLET), 13 involved allogeneic CLET, and 14 involved autologous cultured oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet transplantation (COMET). For autologous CLET, the median ocular surface reconstruction rate, visual recovery rate, incidence of immunologic rejection, infectious keratitis, and ocular hypertension/glaucoma were 74.1%, 54.5%, 0%, 4.6%, and 6.3%, respectively. For allogeneic CLET, they were 71.4%, 71.4%, 7.1%, 12.0%, and 7.1%, respectively. For autologous COMET, they were 66.7%, 66.7%, 0%, 5.3%, and 8.1%, respectively. Systemic immunosuppressants and steroid medications were predominantly used following allogeneic CLET, whereas they were not routinely used after autologous CLET. Three studies focused on the treatment of keratoconus using autologous adipose-derived adult stem cells and reported no marked adverse events. One study reported on the treatment of bullous keratopathy using allogeneic cultured corneal endothelial cells. All patients achieved an endothelial cell density of >500 cells, and the corrected distance visual acuity improved in 82% of the treated eyes.

conclusionsThe results show that regenerative medicine for the cornea demonstrated a satisfactory efficacy and safety. Through translational research, we are expecting to establish a new treatment for waiting patients.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesEpithelium, CornealLimbus CorneaeCells, CulturedCorneaEndothelial CellsHumansRegenerative MedicineTransplantation, AutologousClinical researchCorneaRegenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID33591470
OpenAlexW3129574611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.