Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591452›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2021

Sacral neuromodulation for the prevention of a permanent stoma in patients with severe defecation disorder following intersphincteric resection.

Hiroya Enomoto, Yuji Nishizawa, Koji Inamori, Hiro Hasegawa, Koji Ikeda, Yuichiro Tsukada, Takeshi Sasaki, Masaaki Ito

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroya EnomotoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-082X
Yuji NishizawaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan. yunishiz@east.ncc.go.jp.
Koji InamoriDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Hiro HasegawaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Koji IkedaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Yuichiro TsukadaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Takeshi SasakiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Masaaki ItoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan. maito@east.ncc.go.jp.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSevere defecation disorder occurs frequently in coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer, and may affect quality of life. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been reported to be successful after rectal resection, but there are no results for patients treated with intersphincteric resection (ISR).

methodsA retrospective single-center study of SNM was performed for patient with defecation disorder following ISR. Pre- and post-treatment bowel frequencies, fecal incontinence episodes, and Wexner, LARS and FIQL scores were assessed to evaluate the efficacy. A good response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction of bowel frequency per day or fecal incontinence episodes per week.

results10 patients (7 males, mean age 67.5 years) underwent SNM. All patients had severe fecal incontinence with a median Wexner score of 15 (13-20) and a median LARS score of 41 (36-41). The Wexner score improved after SNM, but not significantly (p = 0.06). LARS and FIQL scores significantly improved after SNM (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). At the end of follow-up, the good response rate was 40%. Three cases without a good response required creation of a permanent stoma.

conclusionSeven out of 10 patients did not require a permanent colostomy after SNM. SNM should be considered before performing a permanent colostomy.

Indexed as

ColostomyDefecationSurgical StomasAgedAnal CanalAnastomosis, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLumbosacral PlexusMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeIntersphincteric resectionLow anterior resection syndromeNeuromodulationSacral nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33591452
OpenAlexW3130901948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.