ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Versatility and clinical effectiveness of a synthetic sealing hemostatic patch as alternative to parenchyma suturing in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImprovements in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in order to minimize perioperative warm ischemia time (WIT), complications, and consequently patient outcome are desirable. Veriset™ is a ready-to-use hemostatic patch of absorbable oxidized cellulose and hydrogel components that has earlier been implemented in vascular and hepatic surgery. We report our experience using this device in LPN.
methodsPatients with a solitary malignant renal mass suspicious for renal cancer underwent LPN with either the use of Veriset™ hemostatic patch (n = 40) or conventional suture technique (n = 40). Patient characteristics, operation time and WIT, postoperative course and complications were recorded retrospectively. Tumor complexity was calculated according to the R.E.N.A.L. score. Outcome was determined according to the "trifecta" criteria (negative surgical margin, WIT < 25 min, no complications within 30 days).
resultsNo significant differences with regard to clinical parameters and median R.E.N.A.L. score (6) were observed between both groups. Operation time (mean 127.1 min vs. 162. 8 min; p = 0.001) and WIT were both lower in the Veriset™ group (14.6 min vs. 20.6 min; p = 0.01). No differences in surgical margins (p = 0.602) and overall complication rates at 30 (p = 0.599) and 90 days (p = 0.611) postoperatively were noticed. The surgical outcome according to "trifecta" was achieved in 65% of patients using Veriset™ and in 57.5% of patients by suture closure, respectively.
conclusionThe hemostatic Veriset™ patch can successfully be implemented in LPN. Handling and application appear favorable, thereby reducing operation time and WIT. The present results suggest that the device may represent an alternative to parenchyma suturing in LPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.