Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591438›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

Comparative study of silicone membrane simulator and animal eye models for sub-Tenon's block.

Nimal Jagadeesh Kumar, Jaichandran V Venkatakrishnan, Chandra M Kumar, Boby George, Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nimal Jagadeesh KumarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Jaichandran V VenkatakrishnanDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
Chandra M KumarDepartment of Anaesthesia, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Yishun Central 90, Singapore, 768828, Singapore. chandra.kumar2406@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-6004
Boby GeorgeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Mohanasankar SivaprakasamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Indian Institute of Technology Madras · INKhoo Teck Puat Hospital · SGSankara Nethralaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare and assess silicone membrane-based sub-Tenon's block (STB) simulator and animal eye model (goat's eye) for practicing STB in terms of anatomical similarity and feel of texture of eye layers. The study included 34 participants (26 learners and 8 consultants) from tertiary ophthalmic centres. The participants were divided into groups A and B. Group A performed STB on the goat's eyes before using the silicone membrane simulator. Group B performed STB on the simulator and further proceeded to the goat's eye. Participants had to rate the anatomical similarity and feel of the texture for the simulator model on a scale of 0-10 and share their preference between the two models. In group A, the scores given to the simulator model and the feel of texture of layers were 8.05 ± 0.88 and 7.97 ± 1.07, respectively, and the scores given to the animal model and the feel of texture of layers were 8.11 ± 0.97 and 8.21 ± 0.88, respectively. Group B participants scored the simulator model and feel of texture of layers with 8.13 ± 0.95 and 8.25 ± 0.99, respectively. Overall, 89% participants preferred the simulator; the reasons included ease of usage, helpful warning system, absence of biological waste, and facility for repeatable training. The study validated anatomical accuracy, preference, and ability of usage of the STB simulator. For broader usage, further study involving higher number of participants is recommended.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalAnimalsSiliconesAnesthetics, LocalSiliconesNeedle-based blocksOphthalmic regional anaesthesiaPeribulbarRetrobulbarSub-Tenon’s blockSub-Tenon’s simulator

Identifiers

PMID33591438
OpenAlexW3131305498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.