Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591432›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Continuous quality improvement in measure development: Lessons from building a novel clinical feedback system.

Samuel S Nordberg, Andrew A McAleavey, Christian Moltu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Moving beyond global scores: the added value of clinical dimensions for assessing HRQoL in mental disorders.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Response processes for patients providing quantitative self-report data: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  9. Initial quantitative development of the Norse Feedback system: a novel clinical feedback system for routine mental healthcare.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  10. Complexity and potentials of clinical feedback in mental health: an in-depth study of patient processes.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel S NordbergHarvard School of Population Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. samnordberg@gmail.com.
Andrew A McAleaveyWeill Cornell Medical School, New York, NY, USA.
Christian MoltuDistrict General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 269097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile the use of clinical feedback systems has become commonplace in psychological treatment, many of the most common instruments used for this purpose have not changed in decades. This paper describes the first four cycles of a measure development method designed to embrace continuous quality improvement.

methodsUsing techniques and philosophies developed in business management and academia-lean continuous quality improvement, action research, and practice research networks-we iterated through multiple cycles of development with the goal of creating an optimal clinical feedback system. These cycles emphasize building capacity to receive and implement feedback from a variety of stakeholders, especially patients and providers of behavioral health services, while also being responsive to quantitative findings from measure development.

resultsIterating measure development with stakeholder feedback over the course of 5 years has resulted in a novel measurement system with 19 subscales administered via branching logic, and a supporting practice research network to sustain development.

conclusionIn developing a new clinical feedback system, the less-frequently-discussed practical aspects of measure development require close attention. Specifically, being willing to embrace change, planning for iteration, and systematically seeking stakeholder feedback are identified as central methods for improving clinical feedback systems.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementQuality of LifeFeedbackHumansMotivationResearch DesignClinical feedback systemContinuous quality improvementRoutine outcome monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33591432
PMCPMC8528746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.