Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591346›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2021

Effect of High-Intensity Strength Training on Knee Pain and Knee Joint Compressive Forces Among Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: The START Randomized Clinical Trial.

Stephen P Messier, Shannon L Mihalko, Daniel P Beavers, Barbara J Nicklas, Paul DeVita, J Jeffery Carr, David J Hunter, Mary Lyles, Ali Guermazi, Kim L Bennell and 1 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 83 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01489462 nacompletednot on this map

Strength Training for ARthritis Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest UniversityRan2012 to 2018Enrolled377ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsHigh Intensity Strength Training, Low Intensity Strength Training, Attention Control
NCT05190380 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparative effects of high and low intensity progressive resisted exercises on pain, range of motion and functional disability in knee osteoarthritis patients with sarcopenia: a randomized controlled trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LahoreRan2021 to 2022Enrolled84ConditionsOsteo Arthritis Knee, SarcopeniaArmsHIGH INTENSITY PROGRESSIVE RESISTED EXERCISE, LOW INTENSITY PROGRESSIVE RESISTED EXERCISE
NCT06343909 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Intrinsic Foot Muscle Strengthening and Hip Abductor Strengthening on Pain, Range of Motion, Function, Foot Arches and Knee Alignment in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsHip abductor strengthening exercise, Intrinsic foot muscle strengthening along with conventional exercises
NCT06619080 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Ecoguided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis by Local Anesthetic or by Combination of Local Anesthetic and Corticoid: Placebo-Controlled Randomized Blind Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario Fundación AlcorcónRan2023 to 2024Enrolled102ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee/RehabilitationArmsGenicular nerve block with bupivacaine and corticosteroids, Genicular nerve block with bupivacaine, Genicular nerve block with saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen P MessierJ.B. Snow Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Shannon L MihalkoDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Daniel P BeaversDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Barbara J NicklasSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Paul DeVitaDepartment of Kinesiology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
J Jeffery CarrDepartment of Radiology and Radiologic Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
David J HunterRheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital and Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mary LylesSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Ali GuermaziDepartment of Radiology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kim L BennellDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Richard F LoeserDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology and the Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Wake Forest University · USBoston University · USEast Carolina University · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Sydney · AUVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Wake Forest Claude D. Pepper OAIC - RenewalP30AG021332 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jamie Nicole Justice · 2002 to 2026
$36.4M
Strength Training and Arthritis TrialR01AR059105 · NIAMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI MESSIER, STEPHEN P · 2011 to 2015
$3.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059105NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Thigh muscle weakness is associated with knee discomfort and osteoarthritis disease progression. Little is known about the efficacy of high-intensity strength training in patients with knee osteoarthritis or whether it may worsen knee symptoms. Objective: To determine whether high-intensity strength training reduces knee pain and knee joint compressive forces more than low-intensity strength training and more than attention control in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted at a university research center in North Carolina that included 377 community-dwelling adults (≥50 years) with body mass index (BMI) ranging from 20 to 45 and with knee pain and radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Enrollment occurred between July 2012 and February 2016, and follow-up was completed September 2017. Interventions: Participants were randomized to high-intensity strength training (n = 127), low-intensity strength training (n = 126), or attention control (n = 124). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes at the 18-month follow-up were Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) knee pain (0 best-20 worst; minimally clinically important difference [MCID, 2]) and knee joint compressive force, defined as the maximal tibiofemoral contact force exerted along the long axis of the tibia during walking (MCID, unknown). Results: Among 377 randomized participants (mean age, 65 years; 151 women [40%]), 320 (85%) completed the trial. Mean adjusted (sex, baseline BMI, baseline outcome values) WOMAC pain scores at the 18-month follow-up were not statistically significantly different between the high-intensity group and the control group (5.1 vs 4.9; adjusted difference, 0.2; 95% CI, -0.6 to 1.1; P = .61) or between the high-intensity and low-intensity groups (5.1 vs 4.4; adjusted difference, 0.7; 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.6; P = .08). Mean knee joint compressive forces were not statistically significantly different between the high-intensity group and the control group (2453 N vs 2512 N; adjusted difference, -58; 95% CI, -282 to 165 N; P = .61), or between the high-intensity and low-intensity groups (2453 N vs 2475 N; adjusted difference, -21; 95% CI, -235 to 193 N; P = .85). There were 87 nonserious adverse events (high-intensity, 53; low-intensity, 30; control, 4) and 13 serious adverse events unrelated to the study (high-intensity, 5; low-intensity, 3; control, 5). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with knee osteoarthritis, high-intensity strength training compared with low-intensity strength training or an attention control did not significantly reduce knee pain or knee joint compressive forces at 18 months. The findings do not support the use of high-intensity strength training over low-intensity strength training or an attention control in adults with knee osteoarthritis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01489462.

Indexed as

AgedBody Mass IndexCompressive StrengthFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain ManagementPain MeasurementResistance TrainingSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID33591346
PMCPMC7887656
OpenAlexW3130638755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.