Trial reportBlood advances2021
A randomized phase 2/3 study of R-CHOP vs CHOP combined with dose-dense rituximab for DLBCL: the JCOG0601 trial.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- How to improve RCHOP as frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials.Annals of hematology · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic impact of RDI of vincristine in patients with DLBCL receiving R-CHOP: a supplementary analysis of JCOG0601.Blood neoplasia · 2025Trial
- Secondary central nervous system involvement in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab combined CHOP therapy - a supplementary analysis of JCOG0601.Annals of hematology · 2024Trial
- Intensified First Cycle of Rituximab Plus Eight Cycles of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisolone with Rituximab Chemotherapy for Advanced-Stage or Bulky Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Phase II Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL) Study.Cancer research and treatment · 2023Trial
- Impact of resolved hepatitis B virus infection on clinical outcomes in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG0601.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- 2026 Update on the Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.American journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Protocol digest of a randomized phase III study of pola-R-CHP/high-dose methotrexate/IT vs. pola-R-CHP/IT for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with high risk of central nervous system relapse: JCOG2201 (PREMIER).Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of Achieving Progression-Free Survival 24 on Subsequent Overall Survival in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients.Cancer science · 2026Article
- JSH practical guidelines for hematological malignancies, 2023: II. Lymphoma5. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS).International journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Definitions and use of tumor bulk in phase 3 lymphoma trials: a comprehensive literature review.Blood advances · 2025Review
- C-MYC-activated lncRNA SNHG20 accelerates the proliferation of diffuse large B cell lymphoma via USP14-mediated deubiquitination of β-catenin.Biology direct · 2024Article
- Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and new insights into its pathobiology and implication in treatment.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Review
- Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Early Patient Management and Emerging Treatment Options.OncoTargets and therapy · 2022Review
- DA-R-EPOCH vs R-CHOP in DLBCL: How do we choose?Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O · 2021Review
- Combination of Bone Marrow Biopsy and Flow Cytometric Analysis: The Prognostically Relevant Central Approach for Detecting Bone Marrow Invasion in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- 2021 Update on Diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A review of current data and potential applications on risk stratification and management.American journal of hematology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard of care for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the schedule for rituximab administration has not been optimized. To compare standard R-CHOP with CHOP plus dose-dense weekly rituximab (RW-CHOP) in patients with untreated DLBCL, we conducted a phase 2/3 study (JCOG0601, jRCTs031180139). Patients were randomly assigned to R-CHOP (CHOP-21 with 8 doses of rituximab once every 3 weeks [375 mg/m2]) or RW-CHOP (CHOP-21 with 8 doses of weekly rituximab [375 mg/m2]) groups. The primary end point of the phase 2 component was percent complete response (%CR) of the RW-CHOP arm, whereas that of the phase 3 component was progression-free survival (PFS). Between December 2007 and December 2014, 421 untreated patients were randomly assigned to R-CHOP (213 patients) or RW-CHOP (208 patients). The %CR in the RW-CHOP arm was 85.3% and therefore met the prespecified decision criteria for the phase 2 component. With a median follow-up of 63.4 months, the 3-year PFS and overall survival were 79.2% and 88.7% in the R-CHOP arm and 80.3% and 90.4% in the RW-CHOP arm, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.95; 90.6% confidence interval, 0.68-1.31). Although the safety profile and efficacy of RW-CHOP was comparable with R-CHOP and its tolerability was acceptable, weekly rituximab in combination with CHOP during the early treatment period did not improve PFS in untreated patients with DLBCL. This trial was registered at jrct.niph.go.jp as #jRCTs031180139.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.