Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591322›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

The Impact of Purifying and Background Selection on the Inference of Population History: Problems and Prospects.

Parul Johri, Kellen Riall, Hannes Becher, Laurent Excoffier, Brian Charlesworth, Jeffrey D Jensen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolution of quantitative traits with background selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CoalMiner: a coalescent model generator forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Background selection in recombining genomes and its consequences for the maintenance of variation in complex traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Parul JohriSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Kellen RiallSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Hannes BecherInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Laurent ExcoffierInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Brian CharlesworthInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey D JensenSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

On differentiating selective and neutral evolutionary processesR35GM139383 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI JENSEN, JEFFREY D · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Developing novel statistics and coalescent approaches for the improved study of virus evolution R01GM135899 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI JENSEN, JEFFREY D · 2019 to 2020
$367k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135899NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current procedures for inferring population history generally assume complete neutrality-that is, they neglect both direct selection and the effects of selection on linked sites. We here examine how the presence of direct purifying selection and background selection may bias demographic inference by evaluating two commonly-used methods (MSMC and fastsimcoal2), specifically studying how the underlying shape of the distribution of fitness effects and the fraction of directly selected sites interact with demographic parameter estimation. The results show that, even after masking functional genomic regions, background selection may cause the mis-inference of population growth under models of both constant population size and decline. This effect is amplified as the strength of purifying selection and the density of directly selected sites increases, as indicated by the distortion of the site frequency spectrum and levels of nucleotide diversity at linked neutral sites. We also show how simulated changes in background selection effects caused by population size changes can be predicted analytically. We propose a potential method for correcting for the mis-inference of population growth caused by selection. By treating the distribution of fitness effect as a nuisance parameter and averaging across all potential realizations, we demonstrate that even directly selected sites can be used to infer demographic histories with reasonable accuracy.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessGenetic TechniquesModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticBayes TheoremDemographyGenome SizeMarkov ChainsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotideapproximate Bayesian computation (ABC)background selectiondemographic inferencedistribution of fitness effectsfastsimcoal2MSMC

Identifiers

PMID33591322
PMCPMC8233493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.