Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591285›Full record

ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Development and Validation of Risk Scores for All-Cause Mortality for a Smartphone-Based "General Health Score" App: Prospective Cohort Study Using the UK Biobank.

Ashley K Clift, Erwann Le Lannou, Christian P Tighe, Sachin S Shah, Matthew Beatty, Arsi Hyvärinen, Stephen J Lane, Tamir Strauss, Devin D Dunn, Jiahe Lu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Mortality Prediction in a Prospective Cohort of Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley K Clift *Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0061-979X
Erwann Le Lannou *Huma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2236-1862
Christian P TigheDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3091-0286
Sachin S ShahHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1203-4465
Matthew BeattyHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7796-6119
Arsi HyvärinenHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3727-8869
Stephen J LaneHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2455-8263
Tamir StraussHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8502-6899
Devin D DunnHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-0727
Jiahe LuHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2424-1891
Mert AralHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8403-8748
Dan VahdatHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2235-3777
Sonia PonzoHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6754-5078
David PlansHuma Therapeutics, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0476-3342
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the established links between an individual's behaviors and lifestyle factors and potentially adverse health outcomes, univariate or simple multivariate health metrics and scores have been developed to quantify general health at a given point in time and estimate risk of negative future outcomes. However, these health metrics may be challenging for widespread use and are unlikely to be successful at capturing the broader determinants of health in the general population. Hence, there is a need for a multidimensional yet widely employable and accessible way to obtain a comprehensive health metric.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to develop and validate a novel, easily interpretable, points-based health score ("C-Score") derived from metrics measurable using smartphone components and iterations thereof that utilize statistical modeling and machine learning (ML) approaches.

methodsA literature review was conducted to identify relevant predictor variables for inclusion in the first iteration of a points-based model. This was followed by a prospective cohort study in a UK Biobank population for the purposes of validating the C-Score and developing and comparatively validating variations of the score using statistical and ML models to assess the balance between expediency and ease of interpretability and model complexity. Primary and secondary outcome measures were discrimination of a points-based score for all-cause mortality within 10 years (Harrell c-statistic) and discrimination and calibration of Cox proportional hazards models and ML models that incorporate C-Score values (or raw data inputs) and other predictors to predict the risk of all-cause mortality within 10 years.

resultsThe study cohort comprised 420,560 individuals. During a cohort follow-up of 4,526,452 person-years, there were 16,188 deaths from any cause (3.85%). The points-based model had good discrimination (c-statistic=0.66). There was a 31% relative reduction in risk of all-cause mortality per decile of increasing C-Score (hazard ratio of 0.69, 95% CI 0.663-0.675). A Cox model integrating age and C-Score had improved discrimination (8 percentage points; c-statistic=0.74) and good calibration. ML approaches did not offer improved discrimination over statistical modeling.

conclusionsThe novel health metric ("C-Score") has good predictive capabilities for all-cause mortality within 10 years. Embedding the C-Score within a smartphone app may represent a useful tool for democratized, individualized health risk prediction. A simple Cox model using C-Score and age balances parsimony and accuracy of risk predictions and could be used to produce absolute risk estimations for app users.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksMobile ApplicationsCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSmartphoneUnited KingdomappcohortC-Scoredevelopmenthealth scoremachine learningmedical informaticsmobile healthmortalityprospectivepublic healthrisk scoresmartphonevalidation

Identifiers

PMID33591285
PMCPMC7925156
OpenAlexW3122140351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.