Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33591072›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2021

Parental Attitudes Toward Clinical Genomic Sequencing in Children With Critical Cardiac Disease.

Dana B Gal, Natalie Deuitch, Sandra Soo Jin Lee, Rosalie Tang Simon, Danton S Char

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Parents' perceptions of the utility of genetic testing in the NICU.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  3. How Neonatologists Use Genetic Information.The Journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dana B GalDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Natalie DeuitchCenter for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Sandra Soo Jin LeeDivision of Ethics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Rosalie Tang SimonLucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA.
Danton S CharCenter for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Stanford University · USLucile Packard Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Ethical challenges of whole genome sequencing in care of critically ill childrenK01HG008498 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHAR, DANTON · 2015 to 2019
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG008498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThrough improving diagnostics and prognostics genomic sequencing promises to significantly impact clinical decisions for children with critical cardiac disease. Little is known about how families of children with critical cardiac disease perceive the impact of genomic sequencing on clinical care choices.

designQualitative interview study.

settingA high-volume, tertiary pediatric heart center. SUBJECTS: Families of children with critical cardiac disease.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThematic analysis of interview response content. Thirty-five families were interviewed. Three themes emerged: 1) benefits versus challenges of having genomic sequencing results, and 2) fears of clinical applications of genomic sequencing, and 3) nonclinical fears related to genomic sequencing. Participants struggled with perceived uses of genomic sequencing-derived knowledge. They described comfort in foreknowledge of their child's likely disease course but articulated significant apprehension around participating in care decisions with limited knowledge of genomic sequencing, genomic sequencing uses to inform clinical resource rationing decisions, and genomic sequencing uses by third parties impacting financial pressures families experience caring for a child with critical cardiac disease.

conclusionsFamilies' perceptions of genomic sequencing uses in critical cardiac disease appear to strain their overall trust in the health system. Erosion of trust is concerning because the potential of genomic sequencing in critical cardiac disease will be unrealized if families are unwilling to undergo genomic sequencing, let alone to participate in the ongoing research needed to link genomic sequencing variants to clinical outcomes. Our findings may have implications for genomic sequencing use in children with other critical, high-acuity diseases.

Indexed as

FamilyHeart DiseasesAttitudeChildGenomicsHumansParentsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID33591072
PMCPMC8357848
OpenAlexW3132367507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.