Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33590418›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: a literature review.

Morgan Recher, Mohamed Riadh Boukhris, Mathieu Jeanne, Laurent Storme, Stéphane Leteurtre, Nada Sabourdin, Julien De Jonckheere

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05758090 (Comparison of Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05758090 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) Index Versus Standard Hemodynamic Response for Guiding Intraoperative Fentanyl Administration in Children Younger Than 2 Years Under General Anesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorKhon Kaen UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsPost Operative Pain, Analgesia, Children, Only, Narcotic UseArmsNIPE monitor, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Palliative medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Neonatal Pain Management: Is There An Endocrinal Response?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
  5. Pain and heart rate variability in neonates receiving dexmedetomidine.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Morgan RecherULR 2694- METRICS: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, 59000, Lille, France. morgan.recher@chru-lille.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-5083
Mohamed Riadh BoukhrisULR 2694- METRICS: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Mathieu JeanneCHU Lille, CIC-IT 1403, Centre D'Innovation Technologique, 59000, Lille, France.
Laurent StormeULR 2694- METRICS: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Stéphane LeteurtreULR 2694- METRICS: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Nada SabourdinAPHP, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, Anesthesia Department, DMU Dream, 75012, Paris, France.
Julien De JonckheereULR 2694- METRICS: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Université de Lille · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) is a heart rate variability-based technology for assessing pain and comfort in neonates and infants under 2-years-old. This review aims to investigate the clinical utility of the NIPE.

methodsTwo investigators screened Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar for relevant studies, independently. One investigator extracted data, which were reviewed by a second investigator.

resultsThe NIPE was used during/after painful stimuli (6 studies), in the context of general anaesthesia (2 studies), and for comfort assessment (6 studies). A) Evaluation of procedural pain/distress: 2 studies reported that the mean-NIPE could be used for reliable monitoring of prolonged pain, and one study reported the association between instant-NIPE and pain after a stimulus but the instant-NIPE represents the NIPE average over 3 min. Two studies found no correlation between the NIPE and comfort behavior/pain scales, but they mainly differed in patients' gestational age and evaluation methodology. B) There are only 2 studies for the evaluation of nociception during surgery under general anaesthesia with contradictory results. C) Studies assessing neonates' comfort reported increased NIPE scores during skin-to-skin contact and during facilitated tucking associated with a human voice. No effect on NIPE scores of facilitated tucking during echocardiography was reported in preterm infants. One study reported significantly different NIPE scores with 2 surfactant therapy protocols. Overall, study populations were small and heterogeneous.

conclusionThe results regarding NIPE's performances differ between studies. Given the limited number of studies and the heterogeneous outcomes, more studies are required to confirm the NIPE usefulness in the different clinical settings.

Indexed as

NeonatologyChildChild, PreschoolHeart RateHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePainPain MeasurementComfortHeart rate variabilityInfantNewborn infant parasympathetic evaluationPain

Identifiers

PMID33590418
OpenAlexW3132269737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.