Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33590388›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2021

Detecting depression using an ensemble classifier based on Quality of Life scales.

Xiaohui Tao, Oliver Chi, Patrick J Delaney, Lin Li, Jiajin Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antidepressant Effect and Mechanism ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prediction of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnosis Using Brief, Low-Cost Clinical Measures: A Competitive Model Evaluation.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaohui TaoSchool of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia. xiaohui.tao@usq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0020-077X
Oliver ChiAdvanced Analytics Institute, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Patrick J DelaneySchool of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Lin LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Jiajin HuangInternational WIC Institute, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
University of Southern Queensland · AUBeijing University of Technology · CNUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUWuhan University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is an issue that affects 350 million people worldwide. Traditional approaches have been to identify depressive symptoms in datasets, but recently, research is beginning to explore the association between psychosocial factors such as those on the quality of life scale and mental well-being, which will lead to earlier diagnosis and prediction of MDD. In this research, an ensemble binary classifier is proposed to analyse health survey data against ground truth from the SF-20 Quality of Life scales. The classifier aims to improve the performance of machine learning techniques on large datasets and identify depressed cases based on associations between items on the QoL scale and mental illness by increasing predictive performance. On the experimental evaluation on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the classifier demonstrated an F1 score of 0.976 in the prediction, without any incorrectly identified depression instances. Only about 4% of instances had been mistakenly classified into depressed cases, with a significant accuracy of 95.4% comparing to the result from PHQ-9 mental screen inventory. The presented ensemble binary classifier performed comparably better than each baseline algorithm in all measures and all experiments. We trained the ensemble model on the processed NHANES dataset, tested and evaluated the results of its performance against mental screen inventory and discussed the comparable predictions. Finally, we provided future research directions.

Indexed as

Ensemble classificationMajor depressive disorderSupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID33590388
PMCPMC7884545
OpenAlexW3129314729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.