ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2021
Determination of resistance status to amitraz in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from Luzon, Philippines, through bioassay and molecular analysis.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparative toxicity of three variant oils and their nanoemulsions on the brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Analysis of the bacterial community in female Rhipicephalus microplus ticks from selected provinces in Luzon, Philippines, using next-generation sequencing.Experimental & applied acarology · 2023Article
- Putative target sites in synganglion for novel ixodid tick control strategies.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2023Review
- Ethanolic Extracts ofGenes · 2022Article
- Acaricidal and Repellent Effects of Essential Oils against Ticks: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Molecular Identification of Selected Tick-Borne Protozoan and Bacterial Pathogens in Thoroughbred Racehorses in Cavite, Philippines.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Tick infestations and tick-borne diseases are among the leading causes of economic losses in the cattle industry worldwide. Amitraz is one of the most commonly used chemical acaricides against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Resistance to amitraz has been reported in many countries but not in the Philippines. This study aimed to determine whether cattle ticks from provinces in northern and southern Luzon, Philippines, are resistant to amitraz. Engorged or nearly engorged female ticks were collected from 21 farms and allowed to lay eggs to produce larvae. Larval packet test (LPT) was performed using three concentrations of amitraz, as well as a negative control (diluent). Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was also performed to amplify a fragment of the octopamine/tyramine receptor gene and was subjected to sequence analysis by multiple nucleotide and amino acid sequence alignments together with reference strain, amitraz-susceptible strain, and amitraz-resistant strain reported in other countries. LPT results suggest the absence of resistance in all of the tested populations. Interestingly, analysis of the octopamine/tyramine receptor amino acid sequence revealed four out of 14 larval pools having substitutions similar to that of the reported amitraz-resistant strains. Although no apparent resistance was observed in this study, prudent use of amitraz should be practiced as the development of resistance is still likely to occur in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.