Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33590359›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2021

Determination of resistance status to amitraz in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from Luzon, Philippines, through bioassay and molecular analysis.

Sherwin L Alota, Tisha Rogelle J Edquiban, Remil L Galay, John Michael G Bernardo, Kristina Andrea C Sandalo, Billy P Divina, Tetsuya Tanaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current pharmaceutical design · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sherwin L AlotaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Isabela State University-Echague, 3309, Echague, Isabela, Philippines.
Tisha Rogelle J EdquibanDepartment of Veterinary Paraclinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Remil L GalayDepartment of Veterinary Paraclinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. rlgalay@up.edu.ph.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-8308
John Michael G BernardoDepartment of Veterinary Paraclinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Kristina Andrea C SandaloDepartment of Veterinary Paraclinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Billy P DivinaDepartment of Veterinary Paraclinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Tetsuya TanakaLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, Korimoto, Kagoshima, 890-0065, Japan.
University of the Philippines Los Baños · PHIsabela State University · PHKagoshima University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15H05264National Research Council of the Philippines O-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick infestations and tick-borne diseases are among the leading causes of economic losses in the cattle industry worldwide. Amitraz is one of the most commonly used chemical acaricides against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Resistance to amitraz has been reported in many countries but not in the Philippines. This study aimed to determine whether cattle ticks from provinces in northern and southern Luzon, Philippines, are resistant to amitraz. Engorged or nearly engorged female ticks were collected from 21 farms and allowed to lay eggs to produce larvae. Larval packet test (LPT) was performed using three concentrations of amitraz, as well as a negative control (diluent). Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was also performed to amplify a fragment of the octopamine/tyramine receptor gene and was subjected to sequence analysis by multiple nucleotide and amino acid sequence alignments together with reference strain, amitraz-susceptible strain, and amitraz-resistant strain reported in other countries. LPT results suggest the absence of resistance in all of the tested populations. Interestingly, analysis of the octopamine/tyramine receptor amino acid sequence revealed four out of 14 larval pools having substitutions similar to that of the reported amitraz-resistant strains. Although no apparent resistance was observed in this study, prudent use of amitraz should be practiced as the development of resistance is still likely to occur in the future.

Indexed as

AcaricidesCattle DiseasesRhipicephalusTick InfestationsAnimalsBiological AssayCattleFemaleInsecticide ResistancePhilippinesToluidinesAcaricidesamitrazToluidinesAcaricide resistanceAmitrazCattle tickRhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

Identifiers

PMID33590359
OpenAlexW3131271244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.