Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33590348›Full record

ReviewBiological cybernetics2021

A geometry- and muscle-based control architecture for synthesising biological movement.

Johannes R Walter, Michael Günther, Daniel F B Haeufle, Syn Schmitt

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological cybernetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: Recent Trends in Morphological Computation.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes R WalterInstitute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, Computational Biophysics and Biorobotics, University of Stuttgart, Nobelstraße 15, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany. johannes.walter@simtech.uni-stuttgart.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3705-2536
Michael GüntherInstitute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, Computational Biophysics and Biorobotics, University of Stuttgart, Nobelstraße 15, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.
Daniel F B HaeufleCenter of Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Otfried-Müller-Strasse 25, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Syn SchmittInstitute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, Computational Biophysics and Biorobotics, University of Stuttgart, Nobelstraße 15, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2075 - 390740016Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK 2198/1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHM2392/5-2Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Az: 33-7533.-30-20/7/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key problem for biological motor control is to establish a link between an idea of a movement and the generation of a set of muscle-stimulating signals that lead to the movement execution. The number of signals to generate is thereby larger than the body's mechanical degrees of freedom in which the idea of the movement may be easily expressed, as the movement is actually executed in this space. A mathematical formulation that provides a solving link is presented in this paper in the form of a layered, hierarchical control architecture. It is meant to synthesise a wide range of complex three-dimensional muscle-driven movements. The control architecture consists of a 'conceptional layer', where the movement is planned, a 'structural layer', where the muscles are stimulated, and between both an additional 'transformational layer', where the muscle-joint redundancy is resolved. We demonstrate the operativeness by simulating human stance and squatting in a three-dimensional digital human model (DHM). The DHM considers 20 angular DoFs and 36 Hill-type muscle-tendon units (MTUs) and is exposed to gravity, while its feet contact the ground via reversible stick-slip interactions. The control architecture continuously stimulates all MTUs ('structural layer') based on a high-level, torque-based task formulation within its 'conceptional layer'. Desired states of joint angles (postural plan) are fed to two mid-level joint controllers in the 'transformational layer'. The 'transformational layer' communicates with the biophysical structures in the 'structural layer' by providing direct MTU stimulation contributions and further input signals for low-level MTU controllers. Thereby, the redundancy of the MTU stimulations with respect to the joint angles is resolved, i.e. a link between plan and execution is established, by exploiting some properties of the biophysical structures modelled. The resulting joint torques generated by the MTUs via their moment arms are fed back to the conceptional layer, closing the high-level control loop. Within our mathematical formulations of the Jacobian matrix-based layer transformations, we identify the crucial information for the redundancy solution to be the muscle moment arms, the stiffness relations of muscle and tendon tissue within the muscle model, and the length-stimulation relation of the muscle activation dynamics. The present control architecture allows the straightforward feeding of conceptional movement task formulations to MTUs. With this approach, the problem of movement planning is eased, as solely the mechanical system has to be considered in the conceptional plan.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalTendonsArmBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansModels, BiologicalMovementBiomechanicsJacobianMorphological intelligenceMotor controlPID controllerSquat movementUpright stanceViscoelastic actuators

Identifiers

PMID33590348
PMCPMC7925510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.