ReviewDer Internist2021
[CAR T cells as drugs for novel therapies (advanced therapy medicinal products)].
Review in Der Internist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interleukin Inhibitors in Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurotoxicity Secondary to CAR-T Therapy.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTwo commercial chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products, axicabtagene-ciloleucel (Yescarta®) and tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®), are registered for the treatment of B cell neoplasia, for which an increased supply of CAR T cell products is required. PROBLEM: The production of patient-specific CAR T cells as advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) poses considerable challenges with respect to logistics, regulation, and manufacturing.
methodReview of the CAR T cell manufacturing process and the regulatory network, the current challenges, and future development capabilities of CAR T cells for adoptive immunotherapy.
resultsCAR T cells are manufactured under individualized, laborious, good manufacturing practice-conforming processes in decentralized or in specialized centers. Starting from the patient's leukapheresis product, T cells are genetically engineered ex vivo with a CAR, amplified, and after extensive quality control re-applied to the patient. Most CAR T cell products are manufactured in a manual or semi-automated process; fully automated, supervised, and closed systems are increasingly applied to meet the need for a growing number of CAR T cell products. In this setting, research aims at providing allogeneic CAR T cell products or non-T cells such as natural killer cells for broad applications.
conclusionThe significance of CAR T cells in adoptive immunotherapy is continuously growing. As individualized cell products, manufacturing requires highly efficient processes under the control of harmonized protocols and regulations so as to ensure the quality of the ATMP in view of increasing demand and to develop new fields in therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.