Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33590290›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2021

Treatment of large infectious extracranial carotid artery pseudoaneurysms in children: a systematic review of the literature.

Chandrasekhar Sundarrajan, Samya A Isa, James P Caruso, Vin Shen Ban, Gopi B Shah, Brett A Whittemore, Rafael Sillero

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Case Report: Therapy of an Enormous Extracranial Carotid Artery Aneurysm With a Covered Coronary Stent in an Infant and Review of Literature.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chandrasekhar SundarrajanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4955-228X
Samya A IsaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1657-3941
James P CarusoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Vin Shen BanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-8101
Gopi B ShahDivision of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Health, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6468-0995
Brett A WhittemoreDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Rafael SilleroDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. rafael.deoliveirasillero@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9165-2714
Neurological Surgery · USSouthwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExtracranial carotid artery pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of deep neck space infection, and no evidence-based treatment guidelines are available in the literature.

methodTo clarify the existing experience of the different treatment strategies, the authors performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to review all reported cases of pediatric patients with infectious carotid pseudoaneurysms larger than 1 cm.

resultsTwenty-six patients with a median age of 4 years (range 6 months-15 years) were identified. Eighteen patients (69.2%) were treated with endovascular methods, 6 patients (23.1%) with surgical methods, 1 patient (3.8%) with a hybrid endovascular/surgical approach, and 1 patient (3.8%) with conservative management. Recurrence of the pseudoaneurysm occurred in 2 cases (7.7%), both of which were successfully retreated. Of the 6 patients (23.1%) who presented with pre-procedure neurologic deficits, 3 patients had complete or near complete resolution of symptoms after intervention and 3 patients had persistent deficits at last follow-up. Four patients (15.4%) experienced new neurologic deficits post-procedure that resolved at last follow-up.

conclusionThe endovascular treatment tends to be the preferred option to treat a large or giant infectious pseudoaneurysm of the carotid artery in the pediatric patient. However, more evidence is necessary to elucidate comparative safety and efficacy profiles of endovascular and surgical management strategies.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, FalseCarotid Artery InjuriesEndovascular ProceduresCarotid ArteriesChildHumansInfantStentsTreatment OutcomeCarotid arteryEndovascular coilingExtracranialFalse aneurysmMycotic

Identifiers

PMID33590290
OpenAlexW3132989593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.