Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33590005›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Dynamics of Ku and bacterial non-homologous end-joining characterized using single DNA molecule analysis.

Robin Öz, Jing L Wang, Raphael Guerois, Gaurav Goyal, Sriram Kk, Virginie Ropars, Rajhans Sharma, Firat Koca, Jean-Baptiste Charbonnier, Mauro Modesti and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biological Amyloids Chemically Damage DNA.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals binding and bridging dynamics of PARP1 and PARP2 at DNA double-strand breaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robin ÖzDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE 41296, Sweden.
Jing L WangInstitut Jacques Monod, Université de Paris, CNRS, UMR7592, Paris, France.
Raphael GueroisInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91198, France.
Gaurav GoyalDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE 41296, Sweden.
Sriram KkDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE 41296, Sweden.
Virginie RoparsInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91198, France.
Rajhans SharmaDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE 41296, Sweden.
Firat KocaDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE 41296, Sweden.
Jean-Baptiste CharbonnierInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91198, France.
Mauro ModestiCancer Research Center of Marseille, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille 13009, France.
Terence R StrickInstitut Jacques Monod, Université de Paris, CNRS, UMR7592, Paris, France.
Fredrik WesterlundDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE 41296, Sweden.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRChalmers University of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use single-molecule techniques to characterize the dynamics of prokaryotic DNA repair by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), a system comprised only of the dimeric Ku and Ligase D (LigD). The Ku homodimer alone forms a ∼2 s synapsis between blunt DNA ends that is increased to ∼18 s upon addition of LigD, in a manner dependent on the C-terminal arms of Ku. The synapsis lifetime increases drastically for 4 nt complementary DNA overhangs, independently of the C-terminal arms of Ku. These observations are in contrast to human Ku, which is unable to bridge either of the two DNA substrates. We also demonstrate that bacterial Ku binds the DNA ends in a cooperative manner for synapsis initiation and remains stably bound at DNA junctions for several hours after ligation is completed, indicating that a system for removal of the proteins is active in vivo. Together these experiments shed light on the dynamics of bacterial NHEJ in DNA end recognition and processing. We speculate on the evolutionary similarities between bacterial and eukaryotic NHEJ and discuss how an increased understanding of bacterial NHEJ can open the door for future antibiotic therapies targeting this mechanism.

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsDNADNA LigasesKu AutoantigenProtein MultimerizationBacterial ProteinsDNADNA LigasesKu Autoantigen

Identifiers

PMID33590005
PMCPMC7969030
OpenAlexW3132796593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.