Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589928›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Implementing FAIR data management within the German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (de.NBI) exemplified by selected use cases.

Gerhard Mayer, Wolfgang Müller, Karin Schork, Julian Uszkoreit, Andreas Weidemann, Ulrike Wittig, Maja Rey, Christian Quast, Janine Felden, Frank Oliver Glöckner and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ten Topics to Get Started in Medical Informatics Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Gerhard MayerRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Medicine, Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Bochum, Germany.
Wolfgang MüllerHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH), Scientific Databases and Visualization Group, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karin SchorkRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Medicine, Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Bochum, Germany.
Julian UszkoreitRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Medicine, Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Bochum, Germany.
Andreas WeidemannHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH), Scientific Databases and Visualization Group, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulrike WittigHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH), Scientific Databases and Visualization Group, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maja ReyHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH), Scientific Databases and Visualization Group, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian QuastJacobs University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen, Germany.
Janine FeldenJacobs University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen, Germany.
Frank Oliver GlöcknerJacobs University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen, Germany.
Matthias LangeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Daniel ArendLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Sebastian BeierLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Astrid JunkerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Uwe ScholzLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Danuta SchülerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Hans A KestlerUlm University, Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel WibbergBielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld, Germany.
Alfred PühlerBielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld, Germany.
Sven TwardziokCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Center for Digital Health, Berlin, Germany.
Jürgen EilsCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Center for Digital Health, Berlin, Germany.
Roland EilsCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Center for Digital Health, Berlin, Germany.
Steve HoffmannLeibniz Institute on Ageing - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena.
Martin EisenacherRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Medicine, Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Bochum, Germany.
Michael TurewiczRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Medicine, Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes some use case studies and self-assessments of FAIR status of de.NBI services to illustrate the challenges and requirements for the definition of the needs of adhering to the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) data principles in a large distributed bioinformatics infrastructure. We address the challenge of heterogeneity of wet lab technologies, data, metadata, software, computational workflows and the levels of implementation and monitoring of FAIR principles within the different bioinformatics sub-disciplines joint in de.NBI. On the one hand, this broad service landscape and the excellent network of experts are a strong basis for the development of useful research data management plans. On the other hand, the large number of tools and techniques maintained by distributed teams renders FAIR compliance challenging.

Indexed as

MetadataNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareData ManagementGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInternational CooperationPhenotypePlantsProteomeProteomicsSelf-AssessmentWorkflowProteomedata managementdata maturityde.NBIFAIR principleshourglass modelself-assessment

Identifiers

PMID33589928
PMCPMC8425304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.