Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589856›Full record

ArticleReviews in fish biology and fisheries2022

Connecting to the oceans: supporting ocean literacy and public engagement.

Rachel Kelly, Karen Evans, Karen Alexander, Silvana Bettiol, Stuart Corney, Coco Cullen-Knox, Christopher Cvitanovic, Kristy de Salas, Gholam Reza Emad, Liam Fullbrook and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The super wicked problem of ocean health: a socio-ecological and behavioural perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Oceans and society: feedbacks between ocean and human health.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deep aspirations: towards a sustainable offshore Blue Economy.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Rachel KellyCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8364-1836
Karen EvansCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Karen AlexanderCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Silvana BettiolCollege of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Stuart CorneyCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Coco Cullen-KnoxCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Christopher CvitanovicCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Kristy de SalasSchool of Technology, Environments and Design, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Gholam Reza EmadAustralian Maritime College, University of Tasmania Newnham, Hobart, TAS 7248 Australia.
Liam FullbrookCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Carolina GarciaSchool of Technology, Environments and Design, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Sierra IsonCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Scott LingInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Catriona MacleodCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Amelie MeyerInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Linda MurrayCollege of Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Michael MurungaCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Kirsty L NashCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Kimberley NorrisSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Michael OellermannInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Jennifer ScottSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.
Jonathan S StarkAustralian Antarctic Division, Kingston, TAS 7050 Australia.
Graham WoodSchool of Humanities, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250 Australia.
Gretta T PeclCentre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved public understanding of the ocean and the importance of sustainable ocean use, or ocean literacy, is essential for achieving global commitments to sustainable development by 2030 and beyond. However, growing human populations (particularly in mega-cities), urbanisation and socio-economic disparity threaten opportunities for people to engage and connect directly with ocean environments. Thus, a major challenge in engaging the whole of society in achieving ocean sustainability by 2030 is to develop strategies to improve societal connections to the ocean. The concept of ocean literacy reflects public understanding of the ocean, but is also an indication of connections to, and attitudes and behaviours towards, the ocean. Improving and progressing global ocean literacy has potential to catalyse the behaviour changes necessary for achieving a sustainable future. As part of the Future Seas project (https://futureseas2030.org/), this paper aims to synthesise knowledge and perspectives on ocean literacy from a range of disciplines, including but not exclusive to marine biology, socio-ecology, philosophy, technology, psychology, oceanography and human health. Using examples from the literature, we outline the potential for positive change towards a sustainable future based on knowledge that already exists. We focus on four drivers that can influence and improve ocean literacy and societal connections to the ocean: (1) education, (2) cultural connections, (3) technological developments, and (4) knowledge exchange and science-policy interconnections. We explore how each driver plays a role in improving perceptions of the ocean to engender more widespread societal support for effective ocean management and conservation. In doing so, we develop an ocean literacy toolkit, a practical resource for enhancing ocean connections across a broad range of contexts worldwide.

Indexed as

CommunicationEducationFuture seasInterdisciplinaryOcean literacySustainable 2030

Identifiers

PMID33589856
PMCPMC7875172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.