ArticleScientific reports2021
Comparison of cord blood hematological parameters among normal, α-thalassemia, and β-thalassemia fetuses between 17 and 38 weeks of gestation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Compact Differential Dynamic Microscopy-based Device (cDDM): An Approach Tool for Early Detection of Hypercoagulable State in Transfusion-Dependent-β-Thalassemia Patients.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- Cord Blood Hematological Parameters of Fetuses Detected Different Thalassemia Genotypes in the Second Trimester of PregnancyBalkan medical journal · 2023Article
- Gene Mutation Spectrum among Alpha-Thalassaemia Patients in Northeast Peninsular Malaysia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diagnostic value of fetal hemoglobin Bart's for evaluation of fetal α-thalassemia syndromes: application to prenatal characterization of fetal anemia caused by undiagnosed α-hemoglobinopathy.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare hematological parameters among normal, α-, and β-thalassemia fetuses between 17 and 38 weeks of gestation. Pregnant women at risk of having fetuses with thalassemia major and underwent cordocentesis for prenatal diagnosis were recruited. Fetal cord blood samples were collected from 249 fetuses for hematological and DNA analysis. Fetuses were divided into subgroups according to thalassemia DNA genotypes. The average and gestational age of subjects were 27.95 ± 5.78 years and 27.78 ± 3.57 weeks, respectively. The distribution of α-thalassemia, β-thalassemia, and normal cases was 67.87%, 19.68%, and 12.45%, respectively. Significant differences in almost all the hematological parameters (HbF, HbA, Hb, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, and NBRCs) were observed in three groups (P < 0.001, except for RBC, P = 0.446). These differences were also observed in four α-thalassemia subgroups (P < 0.001) and were associated with the number of defected genes. Similarly, in five β-thalassemia genotypes, HbF, HbA, RBC, MCV, MCH and NBRCs were presented differently (P < 0.05). Additionally, the trends in RBC, Hb, and HCT changes in three α-thalassemia subgroups (silent carrier, trait, and major) and β
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.