Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589672›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Probing the structure-function relationship with neural networks constructed by solving a system of linear equations.

Camilo J Mininni, B Silvano Zanutto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Camilo J MininniConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental, Buenos Aires, Argentina. cmininni@fi.uba.ar.
B Silvano ZanuttoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural network models are an invaluable tool to understand brain function since they allow us to connect the cellular and circuit levels with behaviour. Neural networks usually comprise a huge number of parameters, which must be chosen carefully such that networks reproduce anatomical, behavioural, and neurophysiological data. These parameters are usually fitted with off-the-shelf optimization algorithms that iteratively change network parameters and simulate the network to evaluate its performance and improve fitting. Here we propose to invert the fitting process by proceeding from the network dynamics towards network parameters. Firing state transitions are chosen according to the transition graph associated with the solution of a task. Then, a system of linear equations is constructed from the network firing states and membrane potentials, in a way that guarantees the consistency of the system. This allows us to uncouple the dynamical features of the model, like its neurons firing rate and correlation, from the structural features, and the task-solving algorithm implemented by the network. We employed our method to probe the structure-function relationship in a sequence memory task. The networks obtained showed connectivity and firing statistics that recapitulated experimental observations. We argue that the proposed method is a complementary and needed alternative to the way neural networks are constructed to model brain function.

Identifiers

PMID33589672
PMCPMC7884791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.