Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589670›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Social signals mediate oviposition site selection in Drosophila suzukii.

Johanna E Elsensohn, Marwa F K Aly, Coby Schal, Hannah J Burrack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. HowBiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Sex-specific site preferences in response to resource value inBehavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Odorant ReceptorInsects · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Larval density in the invasiveEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  9. Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  10. CRISPR/Cas9-based split homing gene drive targetingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. LiveInsects · 2022
    Article
  15. Evaluation of AdditionalFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna E ElsensohnDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. j.elsensohn@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-251X
Marwa F K AlyDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Minia University, El-Minya, Egypt.
Coby SchalDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7195-6358
Hannah J BurrackDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-8245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The information that female insects perceive and use during oviposition site selection is complex and varies by species and ecological niche. Even in relatively unexploited niches, females interact directly and indirectly with conspecifics at oviposition sites. These interactions can take the form of host marking and re-assessment of prior oviposition sites during the decision-making process. Considerable research has focused on the niche breadth and host preference of the polyphagous invasive pest Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera: Drosophilidae), but little information exists on how conspecific signals modulate oviposition behavior. We investigated three layers of social information that female D. suzukii may use in oviposition site selection-(1) pre-existing egg density, (2) pre-existing larval occupation, and (3) host marking by adults. We found that the presence of larvae and host marking, but not egg density, influenced oviposition behavior and that the two factors interacted over time. Adult marking appeared to deter oviposition only in the presence of an unmarked substrate. These results are the first behavioral evidence for a host marking pheromone in a species of Drosophila. These findings may also help elucidate D. suzukii infestation and preference patterns within crop fields and natural areas.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsDrosophilaFemaleFruitLarvaOviposition

Identifiers

PMID33589670
PMCPMC7884846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.