Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589645›Full record

ArticleNPJ schizophrenia2021

Accuracy of self-assessment of real-life functioning in schizophrenia.

Paola Rocca, Claudio Brasso, Cristiana Montemagni, Silvio Bellino, Alessandro Rossi, Alessandro Bertolino, Dino Gibertoni, Eugenio Aguglia, Mario Amore, Ileana Andriola and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ schizophrenia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Beyond Detection: Towards Actionable Sensing Research in Clinical Mental Healthcare.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Risk Perception among Psychiatric Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Paola RoccaDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. paola.rocca@unito.it.
Claudio BrassoDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cristiana MontemagniDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Silvio BellinoDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro RossiSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Alessandro BertolinoDepartment of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Dino GibertoniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Eugenio AgugliaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Mario AmoreSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Ileana AndriolaDepartment of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Antonello BellomoPsychiatry Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Paola BucciDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonino BuzzancaDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Bernardo CarpinielloSection of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Alessandro CuomoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Clinical Department of Mental Health, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Liliana Dell'OssoSection of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Angela FavaroPsychiatric Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giulia Maria GiordanoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Carlo MarchesiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychiatry Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Palmiero MonteleoneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana" Section of Neuroscience, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Lucio OldaniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio PompiliDepartment of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Rita RonconeUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-0970
Rodolfo RossiSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Alberto SiracusanoDepartment of Systems Medicine, Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Unit, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonio VitaPsychiatric Unit, School of Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Patrizia ZeppegnoDepartment of Translational Medicine, Psychiatric Unit, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Silvana GalderisiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Mario MajDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Italian Network for Research on Psychoses

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the accuracy of people with schizophrenia in self-reporting their real-life functioning. In a large (n = 618) cohort of stable, community-dwelling schizophrenia patients we sought to: (1) examine the concordance of patients' reports of their real-life functioning with the reports of their key caregiver; (2) identify which patient characteristics are associated to the differences between patients and informants. Patient-caregiver concordance of the ratings in three Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF) domains (interpersonal relationships, everyday life skills, work skills) was evaluated with matched-pair t tests, the Lin's concordance correlation, Somers' D, and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA). Predictors of the patient-caregiver differences in SLOF ratings were assessed with a linear regression with multivariable fractional polynomials. Patients' self-evaluation of functioning was higher than caregivers' in all the evaluated domains of the SLOF and 17.6% of the patients exceeded the LOA, thus providing a self-evaluation discordant from their key caregivers. The strongest predictors of patient-caregiver discrepancies were caregivers' ratings in each SLOF domain. In clinically stable outpatients with a moderate degree of functional impairment, self-evaluation with the SLOF scale can become a useful, informative and reliable clinical tool to design a tailored rehabilitation program.

Identifiers

PMID33589645
PMCPMC7884703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.