Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589540›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2021

Prognostic comparison of atrial and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation.

Chisato Okamoto, Atsushi Okada, Kunihiro Nishimura, Kenji Moriuchi, Masashi Amano, Hiroyuki Takahama, Makoto Amaki, Takuya Hasegawa, Hideaki Kanzaki, Tomoyuki Fujita and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Echocardiographic Assessment of Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Repair.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Outcomes of Mitral Valve Surgery for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation vs Ventricular Functional Mitral Regurgitation.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for atrial functional mitral regurgitation.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chisato OkamotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0671-793X
Atsushi OkadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan okada.atsushi.hp@ncvc.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0087-4168
Kunihiro NishimuraDepartment of Statistics and Data Analysis, Center for Cerebral and Cardiovascular Disease Information, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kenji MoriuchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Masashi AmanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyuki TakahamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-1936
Makoto AmakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya HasegawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hideaki KanzakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoyuki FujitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Junjiro KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi YasudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Chisato IzumiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAtrial functional mitral regurgitation (A-FMR) has been suggested as a new aetiology of functional MR (MR); however, its prognosis and prognostic predictors are not fully elucidated. Aim of this study was to investigate the prognosis and prognostic predictors of A-FMR in comparison with ventricular functional MR (V-FMR).

methodsThree hundred and seventy-eight consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe or severe functional MR were studied. Functional MR was classified into V-FMR (N=288) and A-FMR (N=90) depending on the alterations of left ventricle (LV) or left atrium (LA) along with clinical context and diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease or cardiomyopathy.

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 4.1 (2.0-6.7) years, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalisation occurred in 98 (26%), 81 (21%) and 177 (47%) patients, respectively, and rates of these events and the composite end point of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation were consistently higher in V-FMR than A-FMR (unadjusted HR 1.762 (95% CI 1.250 to 2.438), p<0.001; adjusted HR 1.654 (95% CI 1.027 to 2.664), p=0.038, for the composite end point). Further analysis showed different prognostic predictors between V-FMR and A-FMR; while age and LA volume index were independent prognostic predictors of both V-FMR and A-FMR, systolic blood pressure and B-type natriuretic peptide were also those of V-FMR, and estimated glomerular filtration rate, LV end-systolic dimension and tricuspid regurgitation were also those of A-FMR.

conclusionsThe prognosis of V-FMR was significantly worse than that of A-FMR, and prognostic predictors were different between V-FMR and A-FMR. Our study suggests the importance of discriminating A-FMR and V-FMR, and that different treatment strategies may be considered for each aetiology.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overEchocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart AtriaHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitral Valve InsufficiencyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Leftechocardiographyheart failuremitral regurgitation

Identifiers

PMID33589540
PMCPMC7887352
OpenAlexW3130763637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.