Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589526›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Influence of injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment on intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and efficacy.

Nina M Muñoz, Malea Williams, Katherine Dixon, Crystal Dupuis, Amanda McWatters, Rony Avritscher, Soraya Zorro Manrique, Kevin McHugh, Ravi Murthy, Alda Tam and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Fracking in Tumors: A Key Drug Transport Mechanism.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Virus nanotechnology for intratumoural immunotherapy.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nina M MuñozInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Malea WilliamsInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Katherine DixonInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Crystal DupuisInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Amanda McWattersInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rony AvritscherInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Soraya Zorro ManriqueMelanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kevin McHughDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ravi MurthyInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Alda TamInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Aung NaingDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4803-8513
Sapna P PatelMelanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1339-1517
David LeachDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jeffrey D HartgerinkDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Simon YoungDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Punit PrakashDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Patrick HwuDivision of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0554-2856
Rahul A ShethInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA rasheth@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9615-8985
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRice University · USKansas State University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Molecularly targeted photothermal ablation to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of immunomodulatory therapies in hepatocellular carcinomaR21EB026089 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHETH, RAHUL ANIL · 2019 to 2021
$640k
STINGel Immunotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Head and Neck CancerR21DE027794 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI YOUNG, SIMON · 2018 to 2019
$440k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB026089NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE027794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntratumoral delivery of immunotherapeutics represents a compelling solution to directly address local barriers to tumor immunity. However, we have previously shown that off-target delivery is a substantial problem during intratumoral injections; this can lead to diminished drug efficacy and systemic toxicities. We have identified three variables that influence intratumoral drug delivery: injection technique, drug formulation and tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of modifications in each variable on intratumoral drug delivery and immunotherapy efficacy.

methodsIntratumoral injections were performed in a hybrid image-guided intervention suite with ultrasound, fluoroscopy and CT scanning capabilities in both rat and mouse syngeneic tumor models. Intratumoral drug distribution was quantified by CT volumetric imaging. The influence of varying needle design and hydrogel-based drug delivery on the immune response to a stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist was evaluated using flow cytometry and single cell RNA sequencing. We also evaluated the influence of tumor stiffness on drug injection distribution.

resultsVariations in needle design, specifically with the use of a multiside hole needle, led to approximately threefold improvements in intratumoral drug deposition relative to conventional end-hole needles. Likewise, delivery of a STING agonist through a multiside hole needle led to significantly increased expression of type I interferon-associated genes and 'inflammatory' dendritic cell gene signatures relative to end-hole STING agonist delivery. A multidomain peptide-based hydrogel embedded with a STING agonist led to substantial improvements in intratumoral deposition; however, the hydrogel was noted to generate a strong immune response against itself within the target tumor. Evaluation of tumor stroma on intratumoral drug delivery revealed that there was a greater than twofold improvement in intratumoral distribution in soft tumors (B16 melanoma) compared with firm tumors (MC38 colorectal).

conclusionsInjection technique, drug formulation and tumor stiffness play key roles in the accurate delivery of intratumoral immunotherapeutics.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersImmunotherapyAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDrug CompoundingFemaleHydrogelsInjections, IntralesionalLiver NeoplasmsMelanoma, ExperimentalMembrane ProteinsMiceAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CarriersHydrogelsMembrane ProteinsPeptidesSting1 protein, ratSTING Proteindrug evaluationinvestigationalpreclinicaltherapiestranslational medical researchtumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33589526
PMCPMC7887346
OpenAlexW3129645890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.