Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589455›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Automated mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of cardiac arrest: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing machine to human.

Manuel Obermaier, Johannes B Zimmermann, Erik Popp, Markus A Weigand, Sebastian Weiterer, Alexander Dinse-Lambracht, Claus-Martin Muth, Benedikt L Nußbaum, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Stephan Seewald and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel ObermaierDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany manuel.obermaier@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0881-4757
Johannes B ZimmermannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Erik PoppDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian WeitererDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander Dinse-LambrachtDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Claus-Martin MuthDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Benedikt L NußbaumDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Jan-Thorsten GräsnerInstitute for Emergency Medicine, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel, Germany.
Stephan SeewaldInstitute for Emergency Medicine, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel, Germany.
Katrin JensenInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Svenja E SeideInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in industrialised countries. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines follow the principles of closed chest compression as described for the first time in 1960. Mechanical CPR devices are designed to improve chest compression quality, thus considering the improvement of resuscitation outcomes. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis methodology to assess trials investigating the therapeutic effect of automated mechanical CPR devices at the rate of return of spontaneous circulation, neurological state and secondary endpoints (including short-term and long-term survival, injuries and surrogate parameters for CPR quality) in comparison with manual chest compressions in adults with cardiac arrest. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A sensitive search strategy will be employed in established bibliographic databases from inception until the date of search, followed by forward and backward reference searching. We will include randomised and quasi-randomised trials in qualitative analysis thus comparing mechanical to manual CPR. Studies reporting survival outcomes will be included in quantitative analysis. Two reviewers will assess independently publications using a predefined data collection form. Standardised tools will be used for data extraction, risks of bias and quality of evidence. If enough studies are identified for meta-analysis, the measures of association will be calculated by dint of bivariate random-effects models. Statistical heterogeneity will be evaluated by I ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval will be needed because data from previous studies will be retrieved and analysed. Most resuscitation studies are conducted under an emergency exception for informed consent. This publication contains data deriving from a dissertation project. We will disseminate the results through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017051633.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAdultEmergency Service, HospitalHeart MassageHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicThoraxaccident & emergency medicineadult intensive & critical carecardiologycoronary heart diseasestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID33589455
PMCPMC7887349
OpenAlexW3130056033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.