Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33589305›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2021

CCopeY: A Mixed-Methods Coproduced Study on the Mental Health Status and Coping Strategies of Young People During COVID-19 UK Lockdown.

Lindsay H Dewa, Caroline Crandell, Elizabeth Choong, Jack Jaques, Alex Bottle, Catherine Kilkenny, Anna Lawrence-Jones, Martina Di Simplicio, Dasha Nicholls, Paul Aylin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Collaborating With Young People: Identifying the Barriers and Facilitators in Co-Designed Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Adolescents' and young people's experiences of social relationships and health concerns during COVID-19.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lindsay H DewaNIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: l.dewa@imperial.ac.uk.
Caroline CrandellNIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Elizabeth ChoongNIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jack JaquesNIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alex BottleSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Catherine KilkennyInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anna Lawrence-JonesInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Martina Di SimplicioDivision of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dasha NichollsDivision of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul AylinNIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on young people's mental health is an increasing priority. Studies to date are largely surveys and lack meaningful involvement from service users in their design, planning, and delivery. The study aimed to examine the mental health status and coping strategies of young people during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown using coproduction methodology.

methodsThe mental health status of young people (aged 16-24) in April 2020 was established utilizing a sequential explanatory coproduced mixed methods design. Factors associated with poor mental health status, including coping strategies, were also examined using an online survey and semi-structured interviews.

resultsSince the lockdown, 30.3% had poor mental health, and 10.8% had self-harmed. Young people identifying as Black/Black-British ethnicity had the highest increased odds of experiencing poor mental health (odds ratio [OR] 3.688, 95% CI .54-25.40). Behavioral disengagement (OR 1.462, 95% CI 1.22-1.76), self-blame (OR 1.307 95% CI 1.10-1.55), and substance use (OR 1.211 95% CI 1.02-1.44) coping strategies, negative affect (OR 1.109, 95% CI 1.07-1.15), sleep problems (OR .915 95% CI .88-.95) and conscientiousness personality trait (OR .819 95% CI .69-.98) were significantly associated with poor mental health. Three qualitative themes were identified: (1) pre-existing/developed helpful coping strategies employed, (2) mental health difficulties worsened, and (3) mental health and nonmental health support needed during and after lockdown.

conclusionPoor mental health is associated with dysfunctional coping strategies. Innovative coping strategies can help other young people cope during and after lockdowns, with digital and school promotion and application.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalMental HealthAdolescentCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Health StatusHumansPandemicsUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33589305
PMCPMC9188746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.